Bug 992285 - fpc: Needs to be boot-strapped for ARM
Summary: fpc: Needs to be boot-strapped for ARM
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: fpc
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Joost van der Sluis
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F20FTBFS 992805
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-05 04:14 UTC by Dennis Gilmore
Modified: 2017-09-15 13:24 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-12 10:29:31 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1491788 0 unspecified CLOSED fpc: needs bootstrap for armhfp 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1491788

Description Dennis Gilmore 2013-08-05 04:14:36 UTC
Your package fpc failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5716162

Build logs:
root.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6162/5716162/root.log
build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6162/5716162/build.log
state.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6162/5716162/state.log
NOTE: build logs are cleaned up after 1 week

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2013-08-08 15:06:20 UTC
This is caused by fpc needing bootstrapping on arm, I'm working on fixing this now.

Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2013-08-08 17:48:49 UTC
Successfully bootstrapped, closing.

Comment 3 Joost van der Sluis 2013-08-12 10:19:05 UTC
Re-opened. Beside from the double work that I did on this, as the maintainer of this package..

Why did you add all those patches? It also works without these? And the patch to compile with fpc 2.6.0? Why is that?

Or did you just looked at the (invalidly packaged) debian packages and copied from there?

Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2013-08-12 10:23:53 UTC
(In reply to Joost van der Sluis from comment #3)
> Re-opened. Beside from the double work that I did on this, as the maintainer
> of this package..
> 
> Why did you add all those patches?

Because those are needed to properly support hard float, rather then fpc using softfload on hardfloat targets, see:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21554

> And the patch to compile with fpc 2.6.0?

That one indeed is not necessary, my bad.

Comment 5 Joost van der Sluis 2013-08-12 10:29:31 UTC
True. fpc 2.6.2 does not support hard-float. I thought soft-float would be enough.

Let's leave it this way. It works now, even with hard-float. ;)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.