Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 99325 - Should support gLSB 1.9 changes
Should support gLSB 1.9 changes
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: redhat-lsb (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Lawrence Lim
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks: FC5Target
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2003-07-17 14:21 EDT by Tobias Burnus
Modified: 2014-03-25 20:50 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-11-13 01:19:08 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch for /etc/redhat-lsb/lsb_start_daemon and /etc/init.d/functions (3.04 KB, patch)
2003-07-17 14:22 EDT, Tobias Burnus
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Tobias Burnus 2003-07-17 14:21:27 EDT
Description of problem:
The gLSB 1.9 (currently WIP but accepted by spec review) contains these changes
which the following patch fixes:

- start_daemon, killproc and pidofproc have a -p pidfile argumen
- killproc exit status code fixed (if the program is not running)

Patch to come. highlighted gLSB init script changes (not 100% complete):

Some exit error code fixed would be nice but are only "should" and not "shall"
in the gLSB.
Comment 1 Tobias Burnus 2003-07-17 14:22:42 EDT
Created attachment 92983 [details]
Patch for /etc/redhat-lsb/lsb_start_daemon and /etc/init.d/functions
Comment 2 Tobias Burnus 2004-04-16 05:29:15 EDT
Current LSB-2.0-pre version:
Comment 5 Miloslav Trmač 2006-02-01 13:03:23 EST
Thanks for the patch;  support was added in initscripts-8.22-1.  The remaining
part is a patch to redhat-lsb, in attachment 123705 [details].
Comment 6 Warren Togami 2006-03-07 17:09:40 EST
Comment 7 David Lawrence 2006-04-18 16:35:46 EDT
NEEDINFO_ENG has been deprecated in favor of NEEDINFO or ASSIGNED. Changing
status to ASSIGNED for ENG review.
Comment 8 petrosyan 2008-10-01 23:33:49 EDT
Is this bug still valid?
Comment 9 petrosyan 2008-11-13 01:19:08 EST
The information we've requested above is required in order
to review this problem report further and diagnose or fix the
issue if it is still present.  Since it has been thirty days or
more since we first requested additional information, we're assuming
the problem is either no longer present in the current Fedora release, or
that there is no longer any interest in tracking the problem.

Setting status to "CLOSED: INSUFFICIENT_DATA".  If you still
experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora
release and can provide the information previously requested,
please feel free to reopen the bug report.

Thank you in advance.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.