cycle was identified as a package possibly needing maintainer attention due to the F-20 unversioned doc dir change. The identification is not foolproof, it is basically this grep: grep -E "(/doc|_docdir|_defaultdocdir).+version" *.spec Please review your package and make the appropriate changes, if any. A good starting point is checking the lines output by the above grep for your specfile. For the vast majority of packages, after the changes, the expected outcome is that documentation dirs in /usr/share/doc should no longer contain the package version. More information and tips: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183943 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183973
Looks OK.
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #1) > Looks OK. Not really, again the suggested grep output reveals: $ grep -A 4 -B 4 -E "(/doc|_docdir|_defaultdocdir).+version" cycle.spec #---- set_dir.py ---- cat >set_dir.py <<EOF #generated from cycle.spec msg_dir="%_datadir/locale" doc_dir="%_docdir/%name-%version" icons_dir="%_iconsdir" bitmaps_dir="%_datadir/%name/bitmaps" EOF
In this, it looks like it was broken before, I've fixed it with conditionals.