pidgin was identified as a package possibly needing maintainer attention due to the F-20 unversioned doc dir change. The identification is not foolproof, it is basically this grep: grep -E "(/doc|_docdir|_defaultdocdir).+version" *.spec Please review your package and make the appropriate changes, if any. A good starting point is checking the lines output by the above grep for your specfile. For the vast majority of packages, after the changes, the expected outcome is that documentation dirs in /usr/share/doc should no longer contain the package version. More information and tips: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183943 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183973
The docdir is already unversioned, nothing needs any intervention.
...but examining the suggested grep output would have revealed this: $ grep -A 1 -B 1 -E "(/doc|_docdir|_defaultdocdir).+version" pidgin.spec mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ ln -sf ../../doc/pidgin-docs-%{version}/html/ \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/pidgin Now that the docs are installed into an unversioned dir, that symlink is broken.
Hmm, I completely oversaw that... It should be fixed now: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pidgin.git/commit/?id=ce71969dd2a5883dba76bf7292520c99814e46e9