RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 994044 - cli: --timeout should accept time specifiers
Summary: cli: --timeout should accept time specifiers
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: firewalld
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Thomas Woerner
QA Contact: Tomas Dolezal
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 980210
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-06 14:02 UTC by Tomas Dolezal
Modified: 2015-03-05 13:22 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: firewalld-0.3.9-8.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 13:22:44 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:0520 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE firewalld bug fix and enhancement update 2015-03-05 16:33:07 UTC

Description Tomas Dolezal 2013-08-06 14:02:46 UTC
Description of problem:
* --timeout should accept time specifiers like minute, hour, day or week

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firewalld-0.3.4-1

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
firewall-cmd --add-service=http --timeout 4m

Expected results:
please fix or provide information why do you think it shouldn't be fixed this way
thanks

Additional info:
CCed affiliated users

Comment 3 Thomas Woerner 2013-08-06 15:50:57 UTC
The timeout is handled by firewalld and not by netfilter. firewalld removes all rules and netfilter helpers, that have been added to activate the feature with the timeout after it timed out.

If you enable for example port forwarding, this is more than one rule and depends also on the target (if it gets forwarded locally or not). netfilter is not able to handle this in a good and usable way.

The timeout is used in the same way in the command line client and also in the D-Bus interface: As a natural number. Allowing the use of other values than seconds in the command line client will not be doable with the current D-Bus interface.

Comment 4 Tomas Dolezal 2013-08-07 12:37:57 UTC
Isn't it possible to translate the value from e.g. hours to seconds before sending it over D-Bus?
If only seconds are possible, then user would need to use something like this:
firewall-cmd --add-service http --timeout $((4*60*60)) to achive 4h value.

Comment 5 Thomas Woerner 2013-11-12 12:23:35 UTC
Moving to 7.1.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 13:22:44 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0520.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.