Bug 994592 (kdesdk-strigi-analyzers) - Review Request: kdesdk-strigi-analyzers - Analyzer plugins for strigi
Summary: Review Request: kdesdk-strigi-analyzers - Analyzer plugins for strigi
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: kdesdk-strigi-analyzers
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Martin Bříza
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: kde-reviews
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-07 14:42 UTC by Jan Grulich
Modified: 2013-08-22 12:40 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-22 12:40:27 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mbriza: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jan Grulich 2013-08-07 14:42:53 UTC
Spec URL: http://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/kdesdk-strigi-analyzers.spec
SRPM URL: http://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/kdesdk-strigi-analyzers-4.10.97-1.fc19.src.rpm
Description: Analyzer plugins for strigi
Fedora Account System Username: jgrulich

Successful build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5790016

This package was previously part of kdesdk. Now it's distributed separately in KDE 4.11.

Comment 1 Martin Bříza 2013-08-21 12:06:48 UTC
The standalone spec and spec contained in the SRPM differ. I suppose you wanted to have lgpl and gpl both there.

Comment 3 Martin Bříza 2013-08-21 14:09:43 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[ ]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "GPL", "LGPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mbriza/994592-kdesdk-
     strigi-analyzers/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
     be documented in the spec.
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached
     diff).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: kdesdk-strigi-analyzers-4.10.97-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
kdesdk-strigi-analyzers.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint kdesdk-strigi-analyzers
kdesdk-strigi-analyzers.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
--- /home/mbriza/994592-kdesdk-strigi-analyzers/srpm/kdesdk-strigi-analyzers.spec	2013-08-21 13:48:47.196908129 +0200
+++ /home/mbriza/994592-kdesdk-strigi-analyzers/srpm-unpacked/kdesdk-strigi-analyzers.spec	2013-08-21 13:48:47.489908129 +0200
@@ -4,5 +4,5 @@
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 
-License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
+License: GPLv2+
 URL:     http://www.kde.org/
 %global revision %(echo %{version} | cut -d. -f3)


Requires
--------
kdesdk-strigi-analyzers (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libQtCore.so.4()(64bit)
    libQtDBus.so.4()(64bit)
    libQtGui.so.4()(64bit)
    libQtNetwork.so.4()(64bit)
    libQtSvg.so.4()(64bit)
    libQtXml.so.4()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libkdecore.so.5()(64bit)
    libkdeui.so.5()(64bit)
    libkio.so.5()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    libstreamanalyzer.so.0()(64bit)
    libstreams.so.0()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
kdesdk-strigi-analyzers:
    kdesdk-strigi-analyzers
    kdesdk-strigi-analyzers(x86-64)



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
kdesdk-strigi-analyzers: /usr/lib64/strigi/strigila_diff.so
kdesdk-strigi-analyzers: /usr/lib64/strigi/strigila_po.so
kdesdk-strigi-analyzers: /usr/lib64/strigi/strigita_ts.so
kdesdk-strigi-analyzers: /usr/lib64/strigi/strigita_xlf.so

Source checksums
----------------
http://download.kde.org/unstable/4.10.97/src/kdesdk-strigi-analyzers-4.10.97.tar.xz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 2559ff0a80ca0cb4d6e0568660770cf99f076dab975946fad43e41cd113ad131
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 2559ff0a80ca0cb4d6e0568660770cf99f076dab975946fad43e41cd113ad131


Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 994592 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64

Comment 4 Martin Bříza 2013-08-21 14:10:18 UTC
APPROVED

Comment 5 Jan Grulich 2013-08-21 17:51:34 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: kdesdk-strigi-analyzers
Short Description: Analyzer plugins for strigi
Owners: than rdieter kkofler ltinkl jgrulich mbriza
Branches: f18 f19 f20
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-08-22 12:16:33 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.