Bug 999547 - redhat-support-plugin-rhev cannot be installed in unattended mode
Summary: redhat-support-plugin-rhev cannot be installed in unattended mode
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: redhat-support-plugin-rhev
Version: 3.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.3.0
Assignee: Spenser Shumaker
QA Contact: Spenser Shumaker
URL:
Whiteboard: subeng
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-21 14:21 UTC by Alex Lourie
Modified: 2015-09-22 13:09 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 3.3.0-7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
redhat-support-plugin-rhev could not be installed in unattended mode. Upon running setup, it would ask a question regarding using proxy: "Would you like transactions from the Red Hat Access Plugin sent from the RHEV Manager to be brokered through a proxy server?" There was no parameter to allow skipping this question. This was because the implementation provided an answerfile parameter to ignore setting up a proxy, but it didn't check it's value before it continued. The new implementation checks the value of this environment variable and will only proceed if it is set to True. Additionally, it updates a code considering the value of this parameter.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-21 16:58:16 UTC
oVirt Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2014:0082 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE redhat-support-plugin-rhev bug fix and enhancement update 2014-01-21 21:42:28 UTC

Description Alex Lourie 2013-08-21 14:21:08 UTC
Description of problem:

redhat-support-plugin-rhev cannot be installed in unattended mode. Upon running setup, it will ask a question regarding using proxy:

    Would you like transactions from the Red Hat Access Plugin sent from the RHEV  Manager to be brokered through a proxy server?

There is no parameter to allow skipping this question.

Comment 4 Charlie 2013-11-28 01:34:25 UTC
This bug is currently attached to errata RHBA-2013:15513. If this change is not to be documented in the text for this errata please either remove it from the errata, set the requires_doc_text flag to 
minus (-), or leave a "Doc Text" value of "--no tech note required" if you do not have permission to alter the flag.

Otherwise to aid in the development of relevant and accurate release documentation, please fill out the "Doc Text" field above with these four (4) pieces of information:

* Cause: What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present.
* Consequence: What happens when the bug presents.
* Fix: What was done to fix the bug.
* Result: What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. (NB: this is not the same as 'the bug doesn't present anymore')

Once filled out, please set the "Doc Type" field to the appropriate value for the type of change made and submit your edits to the bug.

For further details on the Cause, Consequence, Fix, Result format please refer to:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#cf_release_notes 

Thanks in advance.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2014-01-21 16:58:16 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0082.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.