RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 999902 - ExcludeArch s390x
Summary: ExcludeArch s390x
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: fcoe-target-utils
Version: 6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: alpha
: ---
Assignee: Andy Grover
QA Contact: Storage QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-22 10:55 UTC by Lubos Kocman
Modified: 2013-11-21 22:28 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 22:28:04 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1683 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE fcoe-target-utils bug fix update 2013-11-20 21:52:32 UTC

Description Lubos Kocman 2013-08-22 10:55:47 UTC
Description of problem:

Hello fcoe-utils is no longer built for s390x. Your package is currently breaking RHEL-6.5 compose.

See fcoe Bug 693443

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

fcoe-target-utils-2.0rc1.fb16-4.el6

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. run dependency resolving fcoe-target-utils on 6.5


Actual results:
fails on s390x since fcoe-utils isn't there

Expected results:

noarch package should not be in s390x repo in the compose

Additional info:

Compose checks excludearch so setting exclude arch to s390x should work

Comment 2 Daniel Mach 2013-08-22 13:20:27 UTC
fcoe-utils.spec:
ExcludeArch:        ppc s390 s390x

You can probably use the same.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2013-08-22 16:40:30 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product
Management has requested further review of this request by
Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat
Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products.
This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release.

Comment 4 Lubos Kocman 2013-08-23 11:23:53 UTC
Hi Andy,

Please let me know once the build is in ET. So I can remove that exception from configuration.

Comment 6 Lubos Kocman 2013-09-04 11:26:31 UTC
Marking as verified. Composes are passing and the configuration hack have been removed.

Lubos

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 22:28:04 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1683.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.