Bug 641276 (CVE-2010-3780) - CVE-2010-3780 Dovecot: Busy master process, receiving a lot of SIGCHLD signals rapidly while logging, could die
Summary: CVE-2010-3780 Dovecot: Busy master process, receiving a lot of SIGCHLD signal...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: CVE-2010-3780
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact: Ales Zelinka
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 654226
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-10-08 08:49 UTC by Jan Lieskovsky
Modified: 2021-03-26 15:07 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 14:04:36 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:0600 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: dovecot security and enhancement update 2011-05-19 11:47:01 UTC

Description Jan Lieskovsky 2010-10-08 08:49:25 UTC
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2010-3780 to
the following vulnerability:

Dovecot 1.2.x before 1.2.15 allows remote authenticated users to cause
a denial of service (master process outage) by simultaneously
disconnecting many (1) IMAP or (2) POP3 sessions.

References:
[1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-3780
[2] http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-October/053450.html

Upstream changeset:
[3] http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/e67b892c9ff3

Comment 1 Jan Lieskovsky 2010-10-08 08:52:09 UTC
This issue did NOT affect the versions of the dovecot package, as shipped
with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and 5.

--

This issue does NOT affect the versions of the dovecot package, as shipped
with Fedora release of 12 and 13 (relevant packages are already updated).

Comment 4 Karel Volný 2011-01-26 16:27:49 UTC
do we have any realiable reproducer? - "Dovecot master process *could have* died if ..." doesn't sound too convincing to me

Comment 5 Michal Hlavinka 2011-01-27 08:00:18 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> do we have any realiable reproducer? - "Dovecot master process *could have*
> died if ..." doesn't sound too convincing to me

I'm not aware of such reliable reproducer. You'll need to have a lot of connections at the same time (in theory 3, but not with idle master process) and still there's only (medium) chance, no guarantee.

Comment 6 Karel Volný 2011-01-27 13:48:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > do we have any realiable reproducer? - "Dovecot master process *could have*
> > died if ..." doesn't sound too convincing to me
> 
> I'm not aware of such reliable reproducer. You'll need to have a lot of
> connections at the same time (in theory 3, but not with idle master process)
> and still there's only (medium) chance, no guarantee.

thanks for the info

so this'd be SanityOnly, no testcase will be written

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 11:47:07 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Via RHSA-2011:0600 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0600.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.