Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bizdelnick/neuro/ctk.git/plain/ctk.spec?id=0cbf527233d2d4534f49ad8befb8da7ec83f2a06 SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bizdelnick/neuro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00157576-ctk/ctk-0.1-0.1.20151015gitbdc8cac.fc24.src.rpm Description: The Common Toolkit is a community effort to provide support code for medical image analysis, surgical navigation, and related projects. Fedora Account System Username: bizdelnick
Is it really worth the trouble to split the plugin-framework and dicom and widgets subpackages? There're couple hundred kb each. Summary is not very useful. Maybe: Summary: Library for medical image analysis, surgical navigation, and related purposes Doc subpackage must be noarch! + license is acceptable (ASL 2) + license file is present, %license is used + package name follows guidelines + provides/requires look OK + scriptlets look OK + dependencies between subpackages look OK + latest version rpmlint: ctk-devel.i686: W: no-documentation ctk-dicom.i686: W: no-documentation ctk-plugin-framework.i686: W: no-documentation ctk-widgets.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) biomedical -> bio medical, bio-medical, medical ctk-widgets.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US biomedical -> bio medical, bio-medical, medical ctk-widgets.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libCTKWidgets.so.0.1.0 exit ctk-widgets.i686: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. All OK. Package is APPROVED. Please fix the noarch issue and the summary.
The summary as specified in the bug title is also OK.
Thank you for the review! > Is it really worth the trouble to split the plugin-framework and dicom and widgets subpackages? There're couple hundred kb each. Yes, but e. g. dicom subpackage depends on dcmtk that is sensibly bigger.
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ctk