Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-GraphViz.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-GraphViz-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: The GraphViz class allows for the creation of and the work with directed and undirected graphs and their visualization with AT&T's GraphViz tools.
Shouldn't this package have some kind of dependency on graphviz?
Yeah, youre probably right. I added graphviz to the Requires.
Cool. Builds OK and rpmlint has only it's usual dangerous-command-in-%post spew which should be ignored. * source files match upstream: 8828e58960e0d93820cb3bdcce85e705 Image_GraphViz-1.2.1.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent (except for erroneous warnings) * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Image_GraphViz) = 1.2.1 php-pear-Image-GraphViz = 1.2.1-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear graphviz php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (PEAR module installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Image-GraphViz New Branches: EL-5
cvs done.