Bug 486937 (rhnlib) - Review Request: rhnlib - Python libraries for the RHN project
Summary: Review Request: rhnlib - Python libraries for the RHN project
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: rhnlib
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F-Spacewalk
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-02-23 11:06 UTC by Miroslav Suchý
Modified: 2009-10-29 16:59 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-16 09:20:41 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
dgilmore: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miroslav Suchý 2009-02-23 11:06:54 UTC 
SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnlib/rhnlib.spec
SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnlib/rhnlib-2.5.10-1.src.rpm

Description:
rhnlib is a collection of python modules used by the 
Red Hat Network (http://rhn.redhat.com) software.

Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1145761
Comment 1 Dennis Gilmore 2009-03-13 03:29:40 UTC 
builds fine in mock on F-11. 

rpmlint is quiet.

source matches upstream.
sha256sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/rhnlib-2.5.10.tar.gz rhnlib-2.5.10.tar.gz 
92539024bc5e6cbb8f225333be402bef494a5d2d212c66b813897699c79a3bd7  rpmbuild/SOURCES/rhnlib-2.5.10.tar.gz
92539024bc5e6cbb8f225333be402bef494a5d2d212c66b813897699c79a3bd7  rhnlib-2.5.10.tar.gz

looks good to me

Approved
Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2009-03-13 08:32:59 UTC 
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: rhnlib
Short Description: Python libraries for the RHN project
Owners: msuchy
Branches: F-10, EL-4, EL-5
InitialCC:
Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-16 02:17:48 UTC 
cvs done.
Comment 4 Alexander Todorov 2009-10-29 16:59:50 UTC 
I'm seeing this package in EPEL which is newer than what I have from rhn.redhat.com. Can the two packages conflict or the newer package break things on a RHEL5 system ?
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.