Bug 452450 - (F-Spacewalk) Tracking: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora
Tracking: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora
Product: Spacewalk
Classification: Community
Component: Server (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Clifford Perry
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
: Tracking
Depends On: 452449 452453 452454 452455 452456 452457 452458 452601 452616 452832 nocpulse-common 453111 453457 455266 455443 461736 466777 466879 466906 perl-NOCpulse-Utils 468299 spacewalk-koan 483016 rhnpush perl-NOCpulse-Object perl-NOCpulse-CLAC rhnlib perl-NOCpulse-Gritch eventReceivers rhn-client-tools rhncfg spacewalk-config spacewalk-proxy-html spacewalk-proxy-docs rhnsd yum-rhn-plugin spacewalk-certs-tool rhnmd rhn-custom-info python-gudev python-debian spacewalk-backend PyPAM spacecmd spacewalk-branding python-gzipstream spacewalk-web spacewalk-admin spacewalk-pylint 807479 822443
Blocks: F13Target
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-06-22 22:07 EDT by Nigel Jones
Modified: 2016-02-19 04:43 EST (History)
11 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2016-02-19 04:43:51 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nigel Jones 2008-06-22 22:07:04 EDT
Tracker bug for including Spacewalk (https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk) in Fedora.

Review Bugs are the main ones that come to mind.

Setting to F11 Target tentatively.
Comment 1 Michael DeHaan 2008-06-23 08:44:57 EDT
F11 timeframe may be likely, though we can really get it into F-10 if it's also
still recieving updates when that happens, thanks to 'updates'.  Let's make sure
everything remains F-10 compatible.

Main things that need to be done.

(1) open source database support
(2) package all dependencies, determine maintainers, and file review requests*
(3) get source RPMs out there, and tarballs (which will be needed for package
review approval)

* = the EPEL "layered products" discussion probably also needs to happen with
EPEL steering if not done so already, though I believe we can use FreeIPA as a
precedent if it's included.  If not includable, we at least can and should
include all of the dependencies for easier installation as well as benefit to
other apps that might want to use them.

** = for applications/libs that are more unique/useful and have Satellite
developers as maintainers in RHEL today, they should possibly be spawned as
seperate subprojects in Fedora/EPEL so they can achieve some new life.  Possibly
OSAD if not done so already?

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2009-02-24 08:30:39 EST
We will not make support for PostgreSQL till F-11 GA for sure. 
Moving target to F-12.
Comment 3 Jan Pazdziora 2010-11-19 11:05:51 EST
Mass-moving to space13.
Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2011-04-11 03:34:25 EDT
We did not have time for this one during Spacewalk 1.4 time frame. Mass moving to Spacewalk 1.5.
Comment 5 Miroslav Suchý 2011-04-11 03:37:33 EDT
We did not have time for this one during Spacewalk 1.4 time frame. Mass moving to Spacewalk 1.5.
Comment 6 Jan Pazdziora 2011-07-20 07:53:06 EDT
Aligning under space16.
Comment 7 Tomas Lestach 2016-02-19 04:43:51 EST
We don't want to include Spacewalk to Fedora anymore. Closing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.