Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/vbetool.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/vbetool-0.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: vbetool uses lrmi in order to run code from the video BIOS. Currently, it is able to alter DPMS states, save/restore video card state and attempt to initialize the video card from scratch.
Won't this conflict with the existing vbetool in pm-utils?
(In reply to comment #1) > Won't this conflict with the existing vbetool in pm-utils? oh, I forgot to mention this here. vbetool will be removed from pm-utils, once it is reviewed.
Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/vbetool.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/vbetool-0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm - ExcludeArch: ppc and ppc64 (does not build there) - add Conflicts with old pm-utils package
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 OK: rpmlint is silent OK: package name OK: spec name OK: package OK: license GPLv2 OK: license field matches license OK: license is included in %doc OK: spec file English OK: spec is legible OK: sources match upstream sources 1756f2e71ceaef217220e8e482fce835 vbetool_0.7-1.tar.gz 1756f2e71ceaef217220e8e482fce835 rpmbuild/SOURCES/vbetool_0.7-1.tar.gz OK: builds fine on f7/i386 OK: exclude arche OK: BR OK: no duplicate files in %files OK: permissions OK: %clean section OK: macros OK: content OK: %doc does not affect runtime OK: %install section The package 0f88a30ed64ab5fcdf399021626f7933 vbetool-0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm is hereby approved. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG4mG5QEQyPsWM8csRAlB0AKCFGx7/OhU9jHYFUVS03xdzlBSVvgCcDi6P 5RR/GduSQHVpxbJxZlQjZUc= =/A80 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vbetool Short Description: Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Owners: till,pknirsch Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: no If it is possible for you, please also add ajax to watchcommits and commit for devel.
cvs done. See note on radeontool about adding ajax... you should be able to do it via web interface.
built for devel
*** Bug 647327 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***