Bug 214312 (xdms) - Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives
Summary: Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: xdms
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christopher Stone
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-11-07 00:15 UTC by Ian Chapman
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-11-28 13:51:31 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
spec fixes (1.38 KB, patch)
2006-11-12 19:17 UTC, Michael Schwendt
no flags Details | Diff

Description Ian Chapman 2006-11-07 00:15:37 UTC
Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/xdms.spec
SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/xdms-1.3.2-2.src.rpm
Description: 

Extracts Amiga DMS (Disk Masher) archives which are compressed Amiga disk
images. Xdms is particularly useful with Amiga emulators.

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2006-11-12 19:17:41 UTC
Created attachment 141003 [details]
spec fixes

* fix CFLAGS, don't hack VERSION!
* use install option -p to preserve time-stamps of possibly _old_ files
* don't use %{?dist} in %changelog, since it would alter history
* don't package file COPYING, since it just points to xdms.txt
* omit the man-pages .gz extension, prefer a wildcard

Comment 2 Ian Chapman 2006-11-18 23:19:31 UTC
Latest version.

Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/xdms.spec
SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/xdms-1.3.2-3.src.rpm

Comment 3 Christopher Stone 2006-11-23 18:02:09 UTC
==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
O rpmlint output:
  E: xdms configure-without-libdir-spec

  This is because of a non-standard configure script.  You should place a
comment in the specfile indicating why you cannot set libdir.
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec filename matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- package licensed as "Public Domain"
  This is not listed in the open source compatible licenses, but I assume it's
valid for Fedora since rpmlint recognizes it.
- License matches actual license, located in source files
- no license in %doc because it just says "Public Domain" in the source files
- spec file written in American english
- spec file is legible
- source match upstream
  f687a5beba88964ef0afd478efe99849  xdms-1.3.2.tar.bz2
- package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64
- all dependencies listed in BR
- no locales
- no shared libraries
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- package has proper %clean section
O macro usage is consistent
  Why not use %{opt_flags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS since you use %{buildroot}?
- package contains code
- no large documentation
- %doc does not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- package does not require a devel subpackage
- no .la files
- package is not a GUI app
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages


** APPROVED **

==== SHOULD ====
- Add comment above configure explaining why you cannot set libdir
- Use %{optflags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS since you use %{buildroot} instead
of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Not really necessary, but more consistent with your usage.


Comment 4 Ian Chapman 2006-11-28 13:51:31 UTC
Changes applied. Imported and built. Thanks for the review.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.