Bug 1004887

Summary:	[RFE] Allow readonly NFS ISO Domain
Product:	[Retired] oVirt	Reporter:	Amador Pahim <asegundo>
Component:	vdsm	Assignee:	Allon Mureinik <amureini>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	yeylon <yeylon>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.3	CC:	bazulay, bugs, iheim, mgoldboi, nsoffer, rbalakri, s.kieske, srevivo, yeylon
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Improvement
Target Release:	3.6.0
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	storage
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-03-22 15:46:53 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Amador Pahim 2013-09-05 16:44:44 UTC

oVirt requires read/write permissions and ownership of ISO domains. It is common to have a readonly NFS ISO share in companies and currently sysadmins have to create a new ISO repository with read/write permissions and copy there the ISO images instead of just mounting the current company's readonly one.

Expected results:
Make oVirt able to use NFS ISO domain shared as readonly as the real requisite is to read ISO images.

Additional info:
ovirt-iso-uploader may test for permissions and warn user when it's not able to upload ISO images.

Comment 1 Itamar Heim 2013-09-06 05:38:13 UTC

any reason iso domain access by vdsm isn't read only to begin with?
(i remember in the past we used to specify pools it was part of, but i hope/think we stopped doing so)?

Comment 2 Ayal Baron 2013-10-01 06:29:20 UTC

(In reply to Itamar Heim from comment #1)
> any reason iso domain access by vdsm isn't read only to begin with?

not that I can think of.

> (i remember in the past we used to specify pools it was part of, but i
> hope/think we stopped doing so)?

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by 'we used to specify pools'.
In general we want to get rid of the iso domain entirely (just list content of path and allow attaching read-only to guests).

Comment 3 Nir Soffer 2013-12-15 20:17:17 UTC

Similar to bug 1040297.

Comment 6 Itamar Heim 2015-03-22 15:46:53 UTC

Closing old bugs. If this issue is still relevant/important in current version, please re-open the bug.