Bug 1004887 - [RFE] Allow readonly NFS ISO Domain
Summary: [RFE] Allow readonly NFS ISO Domain
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: oVirt
Classification: Retired
Component: vdsm
Version: 3.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.6.0
Assignee: Allon Mureinik
QA Contact: yeylon@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard: storage
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-05 16:44 UTC by Amador Pahim
Modified: 2016-04-18 06:57 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-22 15:46:53 UTC
oVirt Team: Storage
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Amador Pahim 2013-09-05 16:44:44 UTC
oVirt requires read/write permissions and ownership of ISO domains. It is common to have a readonly NFS ISO share in companies and currently sysadmins have to create a new ISO repository with read/write permissions and copy there the ISO images instead of just mounting the current company's readonly one.

Expected results:
Make oVirt able to use NFS ISO domain shared as readonly as the real requisite is to read ISO images.

Additional info:
ovirt-iso-uploader may test for permissions and warn user when it's not able to upload ISO images.

Comment 1 Itamar Heim 2013-09-06 05:38:13 UTC
any reason iso domain access by vdsm isn't read only to begin with?
(i remember in the past we used to specify pools it was part of, but i hope/think we stopped doing so)?

Comment 2 Ayal Baron 2013-10-01 06:29:20 UTC
(In reply to Itamar Heim from comment #1)
> any reason iso domain access by vdsm isn't read only to begin with?

not that I can think of.

> (i remember in the past we used to specify pools it was part of, but i
> hope/think we stopped doing so)?

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by 'we used to specify pools'.
In general we want to get rid of the iso domain entirely (just list content of path and allow attaching read-only to guests).

Comment 3 Nir Soffer 2013-12-15 20:17:17 UTC
Similar to bug 1040297.

Comment 6 Itamar Heim 2015-03-22 15:46:53 UTC
Closing old bugs. If this issue is still relevant/important in current version, please re-open the bug.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.