Bug 1006390

Summary: RFE: Upgrade Enhancements for ovirt-node/RHEV-H
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Idith Tal-Kohen <italkohe>
Component: ovirt-nodeAssignee: Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.5CC: acathrow, bsarathy, chetan, cpelland, cshao, fdeutsch, gouyang, hadong, jboggs, leiwang, lnovich, mburns, ovirt-maint, pm-eus, virt-bugs, ycui
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ovirt-node-2.5.0-17.el6_4.9 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Previously the Hypervisor upgrade process used the already installed codebase. If there were issues in the existing upgrade script they would cause upgrade failures, and users would have to use installation media to correctly upgrade. The new process uses the new image's codebase to perform the upgrade.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-10-29 17:32:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 912711    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
ovirt-node-upgrade none

Description Idith Tal-Kohen 2013-09-10 14:28:21 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #912711 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.4 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 6 cshao 2013-09-16 08:36:21 UTC
Created attachment 798160 [details]
ovirt-node-upgrade

Comment 9 Joey Boggs 2013-09-17 12:58:40 UTC
*** Bug 1008367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2013-10-29 17:32:39 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1461.html