Bug 1006390 - RFE: Upgrade Enhancements for ovirt-node/RHEV-H
Summary: RFE: Upgrade Enhancements for ovirt-node/RHEV-H
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-node
Version: 6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Fabian Deutsch
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1008367 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 912711
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-10 14:28 UTC by Idith Tal-Kohen
Modified: 2013-11-28 00:12 UTC (History)
16 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ovirt-node-2.5.0-17.el6_4.9
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Previously the Hypervisor upgrade process used the already installed codebase. If there were issues in the existing upgrade script they would cause upgrade failures, and users would have to use installation media to correctly upgrade. The new process uses the new image's codebase to perform the upgrade.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-10-29 17:32:39 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
ovirt-node-upgrade (9.65 KB, text/plain)
2013-09-16 08:36 UTC, cshao
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1461 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE ovirt-node bug fix and enhancement update 2013-10-29 21:30:40 UTC

Description Idith Tal-Kohen 2013-09-10 14:28:21 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #912711 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.4 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 6 cshao 2013-09-16 08:36:21 UTC
Created attachment 798160 [details]
ovirt-node-upgrade

Comment 9 Joey Boggs 2013-09-17 12:58:40 UTC
*** Bug 1008367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2013-10-29 17:32:39 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1461.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.