Bug 1011537

Summary: Transaction JDBC object store is available as supported feature
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 Reporter: Ondrej Chaloupka <ochaloup>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: eap-docs <eap-docs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Russell Dickenson <rdickens>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2.0CC: smumford
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation, FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Build Name: 14875, Development Guide-6.2-1 Build Date: 18-09-2013 13:54:44 Topic ID: 4310-459145 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-05-23 07:57:01 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 872437    

Description Ondrej Chaloupka 2013-09-24 13:46:09 UTC 
This BZ is connected to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872437 - Document the use of a Transaction Store via JDBC

The JDBC store will be supported feature for EAP 6.2. It's necessary to document it. Please, check the current state of documentation plus consider following:
 - move info about jdbc object store from Release Notes (http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.1/html-single/6.1.1_Release_Notes/index.html) to Administration and Development guide
 - add to table of configuration item (under use-hornetq-store) option for jdbc (use-jdbc-store)
 - point out (as really important fact!) that JDBC store could be activated just for datastores which are set as jta="false". Otherwise you'll experience a cyclic dependency error (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971358)
Comment 1 Ondrej Chaloupka 2013-10-31 12:50:04 UTC 
As new feature this should be documented in GA. I'm setting blocker to '?' to point out on this bz.
Comment 2 Ondrej Chaloupka 2014-05-23 07:57:01 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 872437 ***