Bug 1011537 - Transaction JDBC object store is available as supported feature
Summary: Transaction JDBC object store is available as supported feature
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 872437
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: eap-docs
QA Contact: Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 872437
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-24 13:46 UTC by Ondrej Chaloupka
Modified: 2018-12-03 20:02 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Build Name: 14875, Development Guide-6.2-1 Build Date: 18-09-2013 13:54:44 Topic ID: 4310-459145 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-05-23 07:57:01 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ondrej Chaloupka 2013-09-24 13:46:09 UTC
This BZ is connected to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872437 - Document the use of a Transaction Store via JDBC

The JDBC store will be supported feature for EAP 6.2. It's necessary to document it. Please, check the current state of documentation plus consider following:
 - move info about jdbc object store from Release Notes (http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.1/html-single/6.1.1_Release_Notes/index.html) to Administration and Development guide
 - add to table of configuration item (under use-hornetq-store) option for jdbc (use-jdbc-store)
 - point out (as really important fact!) that JDBC store could be activated just for datastores which are set as jta="false". Otherwise you'll experience a cyclic dependency error (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971358)

Comment 1 Ondrej Chaloupka 2013-10-31 12:50:04 UTC
As new feature this should be documented in GA. I'm setting blocker to '?' to point out on this bz.

Comment 2 Ondrej Chaloupka 2014-05-23 07:57:01 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 872437 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.