Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
It should be better to add a newline at the end when display the status of sblim-sfcb.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sblim-sfcb-1.3.11-2.el6.x86_64
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install sblim-sfcb-1.3.11-2.el6.x86_64 in rhel6.4 using yum.
2. start sblim-sfcb service.
3. Check the status of sblim-sfcb.
#service sblim-sfcb status
Actual results:
1. It shows the status as the following.
# service sblim-sfcb status
sfcb (24236 24224 24220 24219 24217 24216 24213 24210) is running[root@dhcp-8-148 admin]#
Expected results:
1. It should be better to add a newline at the end when display the status of sblim-sfcb like the follows.
# service sblim-sfcb status
sfcb (24236 24224 24220 24219 24217 24216 24213 24210) is running
[root@dhcp-8-148 admin]#
Additional info:
Comment 2Vitezslav Crhonek
2013-10-08 11:28:40 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 805588 ***
Description of problem: It should be better to add a newline at the end when display the status of sblim-sfcb. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): sblim-sfcb-1.3.11-2.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install sblim-sfcb-1.3.11-2.el6.x86_64 in rhel6.4 using yum. 2. start sblim-sfcb service. 3. Check the status of sblim-sfcb. #service sblim-sfcb status Actual results: 1. It shows the status as the following. # service sblim-sfcb status sfcb (24236 24224 24220 24219 24217 24216 24213 24210) is running[root@dhcp-8-148 admin]# Expected results: 1. It should be better to add a newline at the end when display the status of sblim-sfcb like the follows. # service sblim-sfcb status sfcb (24236 24224 24220 24219 24217 24216 24213 24210) is running [root@dhcp-8-148 admin]# Additional info: