Bug 1023736
Summary: | JAR file should put into /usr/share/java/jline2/jline2.jar | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jochen Schmitt <jochen> | ||||
Component: | jline2 | Assignee: | Marek Goldmann <mgoldman> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jerboaa, mgoldman, mizdebsk, sgehwolf, sochotni | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2013-10-28 08:51:28 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Please forgett the last sentence about the non-responsive maintainership because I was accitendly in mind that jline2 has the same maintainer as the scala package. Hi Jochen, Currently we're in the process of renaming the jline* packages. jline will be renamed to jline1 and jline2 will be renamed to jline. Please see bug 1022897 for more info. After this the resulting package path will be following: /usr/share/java/line/jline.jar Having this in mind, I'm rejecting this bug report. P.S. You shouldn't use manual symlinking *ever* in a spec file. There are tools for it like %mvn_install, %mvn_build, and %mvn_package macros, so I would reject your patch too. (In reply to Marek Goldmann from comment #2) > Hi Jochen, > > Currently we're in the process of renaming the jline* packages. jline will > be renamed to jline1 and jline2 will be renamed to jline. Please see bug > 1022897 for more info. After this the resulting package path will be > following: > > /usr/share/java/line/jline.jar Small correction. It will be: /usr/share/java/jline/jline.jar However, I suggest to specify dependency on jline 2.x as follows (no need to know the precise file path): Requires: mvn(jline:jline) >= 2.10 |
Created attachment 816519 [details] Suggestion patch to solve the reported issue ON Rawhide the JAR file should be in /usr/share/java/line2/jline2.ar regrarding to the current Java packaging guidelines. This is important, because the scala package create a symbolic link to this JAR file. Because there is a non-responsive package maintainer process agains the primary maintainer of this package, I plan to apply the suggestion patch as a provenpackager and start an addtional non-responsive maintainer process for this package too.