Created attachment 816519 [details] Suggestion patch to solve the reported issue ON Rawhide the JAR file should be in /usr/share/java/line2/jline2.ar regrarding to the current Java packaging guidelines. This is important, because the scala package create a symbolic link to this JAR file. Because there is a non-responsive package maintainer process agains the primary maintainer of this package, I plan to apply the suggestion patch as a provenpackager and start an addtional non-responsive maintainer process for this package too.
Please forgett the last sentence about the non-responsive maintainership because I was accitendly in mind that jline2 has the same maintainer as the scala package.
Hi Jochen, Currently we're in the process of renaming the jline* packages. jline will be renamed to jline1 and jline2 will be renamed to jline. Please see bug 1022897 for more info. After this the resulting package path will be following: /usr/share/java/line/jline.jar Having this in mind, I'm rejecting this bug report. P.S. You shouldn't use manual symlinking *ever* in a spec file. There are tools for it like %mvn_install, %mvn_build, and %mvn_package macros, so I would reject your patch too.
(In reply to Marek Goldmann from comment #2) > Hi Jochen, > > Currently we're in the process of renaming the jline* packages. jline will > be renamed to jline1 and jline2 will be renamed to jline. Please see bug > 1022897 for more info. After this the resulting package path will be > following: > > /usr/share/java/line/jline.jar Small correction. It will be: /usr/share/java/jline/jline.jar However, I suggest to specify dependency on jline 2.x as follows (no need to know the precise file path): Requires: mvn(jline:jline) >= 2.10