Bug 1072045

Summary:	Shouldn't be allowed to create a version for blank template
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	meital avital <mavital>
Component:	ovirt-engine	Assignee:	Nobody <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	meital avital <mavital>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.4.0	CC:	acathrow, gklein, iheim, lpeer, mavital, michal.skrivanek, ofrenkel, Rhev-m-bugs, sherold, yeylon
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	mavital: needinfo+
Target Release:	3.5.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	virt
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-08-15 13:25:09 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1072384

Description meital avital 2014-03-03 18:45:49 UTC

Description of problem:
The blank template does not have a real image and it's not a editable objects and so we should not be able to create versions for blank template.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Select a shoutdown vm
2. Choose make template -> 
3. Select in the 'Root Template' : Blank

Actual results:
succeed to create a version of blank template.

Expected results:
Shouldn't be allowed to select blank template. 

Additional info:

Comment 1 Michal Skrivanek 2014-03-04 08:16:32 UTC

we're actually thinking of allowing it to be editable in 3.5(with instance types) to configure system-wide defaults. Then it would make sense to have versions as well

Though at the moment it's a wrong behavior indeed. I'm curious, can you then edit that newly created version?

Comment 2 meital avital 2014-03-05 15:27:22 UTC

Yes, I can edit the template that is a sub version of blank.

Comment 3 Omer Frenkel 2014-03-06 09:16:32 UTC

when fixing, need to re-consider, as instance types should be available,
making blank template also system (defualt) object and then having subversions might make sense

Comment 5 Michal Skrivanek 2014-08-15 13:25:09 UTC

we're going to address it in bug 1130174 the proper way

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1130174 ***