Bug 1100283

Summary:	VDSM to require kernel-2.6.32-465 on EL for NFSv4 fixes.
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Allon Mureinik <amureini>
Component:	vdsm	Assignee:	Allon Mureinik <amureini>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ori Gofen <ogofen>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.5.0	CC:	acanan, amureini, bazulay, gklein, lpeer, ogofen, scohen, tnisan, yeylon
Target Milestone:	ovirt-3.6.0-rc	Keywords:	EasyFix
Target Release:	3.6.0	Flags:	scohen: Triaged+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	v4.17.0.3	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1100285 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-03-09 19:21:35 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1075123
Bug Blocks:	1100285

Description Allon Mureinik 2014-05-22 12:28:18 UTC

Description of problem:
bug 1075123 introduces some fixes for NFSv4, which RHEV should support.
VDSM's build should require this version

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.5.0

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install VDSM with yum

Expected results:
kernel-2.6.32-465 or above should be required.

Comment 1 Allon Mureinik 2014-05-22 12:31:05 UTC

Note that we should wait for bug 1075123 to be released.

Comment 2 Allon Mureinik 2014-09-23 11:18:02 UTC

bug 1075123 will be included in RHEL 6.6, not in time for RHEVM 3.5.0.

Comment 3 Ori Gofen 2015-05-03 11:38:44 UTC

Allon, don't I need the spec file in-order to verify this?

Comment 4 Allon Mureinik 2015-05-03 13:55:04 UTC

(In reply to Ori Gofen from comment #3)
> Allon, don't I need the spec file in-order to verify this?
Sorry, but I don't understand the question.
Can you elaborate?

Comment 5 Ori Gofen 2015-05-03 14:17:08 UTC

is there any other way to verify this bug, without actually installing vdsm on an old kernel?

Comment 6 Allon Mureinik 2015-05-03 14:34:05 UTC

(In reply to Ori Gofen from comment #5)
> is there any other way to verify this bug, without actually installing vdsm
> on an old kernel?
Sure - Just run "rpm -qR" to see the list of dependencies. E.g., on my Fedora machine:

amureini@dhcp-0-202 ~ $ rpm -qR vdsm | grep kernel
kernel >= 3.11.3-201

Comment 7 Ori Gofen 2015-05-05 12:50:56 UTC

Verified on 3.6 master

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2016-03-09 19:21:35 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0362.html