Bug 111135

Summary: gmp-devel with wrong symlink for libgmpxx.so
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Gilles J. Seguin <segg.gill>
Component: gmpAssignee: Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1CC: mitr, rstorms
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-12-02 08:05:06 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch remove a offending line creating a bad symlink for libgmpxx.so none

Description Gilles J. Seguin 2003-11-28 11:20:13 UTC 
Description of problem: bad symlink


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gmp-devel-4.1.2-9.i386.rpm

How reproducible:
not applicable

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libgmpxx.so
give -> /usr/lib/gmpxx.so.3
which is not a existing file or link

Expected results:
At least point to /usr/lib/libgmpxx.so.3 or 3.1.4

Additional info:
see patch file for a line commented out from spec file.
Comment 1 Gilles J. Seguin 2003-11-28 11:26:39 UTC 
Created attachment 96233 [details]
patch remove a offending line creating a bad symlink for libgmpxx.so
Comment 2 Miloslav Trmac 2003-11-28 16:51:10 UTC 
Patch looks correct.
rpm -q --whatrequires gmpxx.so.3 --dbpath
/usr/lib/rpmdb/i386-redhat-linux/redhat/
indicates gmpxx.so.3 is not used by anyone.

Additionally, the package doesn't build on FC1 due to its usage
of LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool; it sets CXX to i386-redhat-linux-c++,
but /usr/bin/libtool knows only "c++".
Comment 3 Florian La Roche 2003-12-02 08:05:06 UTC 
Fixed the broken link, the rpm seems to rebuild fine for me.

greetings and thanks for the bug-report,

Florian La Roche
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2003-12-12 16:37:06 UTC 
*** Bug 111994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***