Bug 1118009

Summary: Document HA solution for Sat 6
Product: Red Hat Satellite 6 Reporter: Dave Sullivan <dsulliva>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: satellite-doc-list
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: satellite-doc-list
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: UnspecifiedCC: adahms, ahuchcha, aladke, andrewrpalmer, avaddara, bbuckingham, bkearney, byodlows, byount, chris.brown, chrobert, cyril.cordouibarzi, elavarde, gkeegan, greartes, hartsjc, jan.gerrit, jdang, jduncan, jlyle, kshirsal, mburgerh, mmccune, nshaik, pdwyer, pgregorycullen, pmutha, riehecky, rjerrido, romarsha, sauchter, sthirugn, suprabhu, swadeley, syangsao, xdmoon
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-04 12:52:16 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1179535, 1425213    

Description Dave Sullivan 2014-07-09 20:30:57 UTC
Description of problem:

Document DR solution for Satellite 6 as first cut HA.

A first cut HA/DR solution for Satellite 6 could be to migrate from one system to another, maybe with FQDN change.

Assuming items are stored in the database we should be able to back that up.

Rebuild/rsync content from one server to the next, possibly changing FQDN, restoring database and returning Satellite 6 back to full functionality.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Satellite 6 Beta

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2014-07-09 20:33:51 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 17 Athene Chan 2015-03-16 01:22:14 UTC
*** Bug 1200960 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 39 Bryan Kearney 2016-10-04 12:52:16 UTC
This has been delivered with https://access.redhat.com/articles/2089291.