Bug 112950

Summary: RFE: System update should check CPU architecture.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ivo Sarak <ivo>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 1CC: veillard
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-01-07 16:50:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ivo Sarak 2004-01-06 16:27:55 UTC
Description of problem:
When to upgrade Fedora Core 1 on different machine with different 
machine architecture, Fedora Core 1 update will fail to detect the 
new architecture and will not upgrade/replace the kernel.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora Core 1.

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install FC1 on Athlon CPU machine;
2. Move the HDD to machine with i586 CPU machine;
3. As the Athlon kernel is unable to start up the machine, upgrade 
the system from the same FC1 media You installed it at the first 
place;
  
Actual results:
Kernel is not being upgraded/replaced and at the end You are still 
unable to start the system.

Expected results:
Kernel replaced and system running.

Additional info:
The box I put the "Athlon" HDD is VIA Samuel2 what is being 
classified as i586.

How do upgrade the box?

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2004-01-06 16:35:35 UTC
The package version is the same and so it's not an upgrade. 

To workaround, you can originally install by booting with 'linux
rpmarch=i586' and it will assume that you're an i586 (should work, not
really tested or supported).

Comment 2 Ivo Sarak 2004-01-07 07:08:24 UTC
Thanks, I'll try this.

But Your explanation about the package version as being the same has
some flaws. Why this kind of upgrade does upgrade 3 packages: xterm,
w3m and compat_db?

Why these are upgraded? And as these packages are upgraded to the same
version then why not add kernel to the same category?

If it still not classify as a bug then I'll add it as RFE.

Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2004-01-07 16:50:21 UTC
Because those packages got flagged as newer for some reason or
another.  An upgrade does not reinstall any packages and this is not
going to change.

Comment 4 Daniel Veillard 2004-09-16 08:57:26 UTC
*** Bug 109212 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***