Bug 112950
| Summary: | RFE: System update should check CPU architecture. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ivo Sarak <ivo> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 1 | CC: | veillard |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2004-01-07 16:50:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ivo Sarak
2004-01-06 16:27:55 UTC
The package version is the same and so it's not an upgrade. To workaround, you can originally install by booting with 'linux rpmarch=i586' and it will assume that you're an i586 (should work, not really tested or supported). Thanks, I'll try this. But Your explanation about the package version as being the same has some flaws. Why this kind of upgrade does upgrade 3 packages: xterm, w3m and compat_db? Why these are upgraded? And as these packages are upgraded to the same version then why not add kernel to the same category? If it still not classify as a bug then I'll add it as RFE. Because those packages got flagged as newer for some reason or another. An upgrade does not reinstall any packages and this is not going to change. *** Bug 109212 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |