Bug 1129661

Summary:	df does not respect device path if specified
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Tomas Dolezal <todoleza>
Component:	coreutils	Assignee:	Ondrej Vasik <ovasik>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Tomas Dolezal <todoleza>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.0	CC:	jscotka, kvolny, ooprala, ovasik, pbrady
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	coreutils-8.22-13.el7	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	TBD - sorry still not sure what to enter here (it is about df differences between RHEL 6 and RHEL 7 caused by /etc/mtab being now symlink to /proc/mounts. Cause: Consequence: Fix: Result:	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	812449	Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-11-19 12:44:35 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	812449
Bug Blocks:

Comment 3 Ondrej Vasik 2015-05-13 18:46:31 UTC

I believe this is not a bug, but I had no time to further investigate this so far. Definitely not a regression - code from the original fix is included in RHEL 7 coreutils - but further extended by upstream.
RHEL 7 df uses extended logic to determine which mountpoint should be shown (from multiple possible options). As Ondrej worked on the deduplication, setting needinfo on him, but I tend to not a bug this request (we have multiple bug reports about deduplication improvements).

Comment 4 Ondrej Oprala 2015-05-14 12:18:36 UTC

As per conversation with Ondrej, we found out the patch we applied to rhel-6 is missing in 7. We further discussed, that it might be better to patch rhel7
with the upstream version of get_disk(), with the last change in the
dbd7c9452 upstream commit.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 12:44:35 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2160.html