Bug 1172394
Summary: | [RFE] rename gwt-extension.jar->ovirt-engine-gwt-extension.jar | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Einav Cohen <ecohen> |
Component: | RFEs | Assignee: | Vojtech Szocs <vszocs> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Jiri Belka <jbelka> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | --- | CC: | bugs, gklein, iheim, jbelka, lsurette, mgoldboi, nbarcet, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, sherold, vszocs, yeylon, ykaul |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | CodeChange, FutureFeature, Improvement |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1013752 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2016-03-11 17:12:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | UX | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1013752 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Einav Cohen
2014-12-10 01:14:53 UTC
Target release should be placed once a package build is known to fix a issue. Since this bug is not modified, the target version has been reset. Please use target milestone to plan a fix for a oVirt release. Is it going to make it to 4.0? (In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #3) > Is it going to make it to 4.0? This BZ was cloned from BZ#1013752 and that one is now closed - I suggest to close this one too. The issue is that someone might mistake "gwt-extension.jar" as 3rd party (GWT) dependency, but it's our code [a]. On the other hand, "gwt-servlet.jar" is indeed 3rd party (GWT) code, which sits right next to previously mentioned JAR file at [b]. [a] {ovirt_src}/frontend/webadmin/modules/gwt-extension [b] /usr/share/ovirt-engine/engine.ear/{webadmin,userportal}.war/WEB-INF/lib As suggested by Tomas in patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/48551/ (now abandoned) a proper solution would be to have a consistent naming convention applied across all oVirt JAR files, so for now I'd suggest to close this and discuss/re-open if really needed. (In reply to vszocs from comment #4) > (In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #3) > > Is it going to make it to 4.0? > > This BZ was cloned from BZ#1013752 and that one is now closed - I suggest to > close this one too. Agreed, thanks. |