Bug 1013752 - [RFE] rename gwt-extension.jar->ovirt-engine-gwt-extension.jar
Summary: [RFE] rename gwt-extension.jar->ovirt-engine-gwt-extension.jar
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: ovirt-engine
Classification: oVirt
Component: Frontend.WebAdmin
Version: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Vojtech Szocs
QA Contact: Jiri Belka
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1172394
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-30 17:18 UTC by Alon Bar-Lev
Modified: 2022-02-25 07:58 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
: 1172394 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-09 12:58:54 UTC
oVirt Team: UX
Embargoed:
sherold: Triaged+

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHV-44869 0 None None None 2022-02-25 07:58:04 UTC
oVirt gerrit 26045 0 master MERGED engine: rename gwt-extension. Never
oVirt gerrit 48551 0 master ABANDONED webadmin,userportal: Prefix gwt-extension.jar 2016-03-11 14:46:02 UTC
oVirt gerrit 74239 0 master MERGED frontend: Remove ovirt prefix in gwt-extension .jar 2017-03-20 17:51:38 UTC

Description Alon Bar-Lev 2013-09-30 17:18:58 UTC 
jar name without signature of ovirt can be mistakenly considered 3rd party.

if we can rename it it would be super!
Comment 1 Jiri Belka 2014-07-04 14:53:37 UTC 
I suppose this is not OK, right?

# rpm -qf /usr/share/ovirt-engine/engine.ear/webadmin.war/WEB-INF/lib/gwt-extension.jar
ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.5.0-0.0.master.20140629172257.git0b16ed7.el6.noarch
Comment 2 Alon Bar-Lev 2014-07-04 14:56:54 UTC 
(In reply to Jiri Belka from comment #1)
> I suppose this is not OK, right?
> 
> # rpm -qf
> /usr/share/ovirt-engine/engine.ear/webadmin.war/WEB-INF/lib/gwt-extension.jar
> ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.5.0-0.0.master.20140629172257.git0b16ed7.el6.
> noarch

no... the name of the jar should have changed.

I see that in my environment too... it should have been:

 ovirt-engine-gwt-extension.jar
Comment 3 Jiri Belka 2014-07-07 06:52:55 UTC 
so based on #2 changing back to assigned as this is not reality in latest ovirt build.
Comment 4 Scott Herold 2014-10-23 14:31:13 UTC 
This was a fully ack'd PRD 3.5 item.  Was there a particular reason this was moved to 3.6?
Comment 5 Einav Cohen 2014-10-23 14:46:43 UTC 
(In reply to Scott Herold from comment #4)
> This was a fully ack'd PRD 3.5 item.  Was there a particular reason this was
> moved to 3.6?

first of all: this is only a code change, therefore there is no affect on the user whatsoever. 
it really doesn't matter if it lands in 3.5 or 3.6. 

it was fully acked for 3.5, but then failed "QA", therefore re-opened. 
as it was around / slightly after the 3.5 FF already and this was a low priority, code-change issue, I've decided to push it to 3.6.
Comment 6 Scott Herold 2014-10-23 15:51:31 UTC 
OK.  Perfect.  I'll rename the BZ so it doesn't pop up in my PRD35 queries.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.