Bug 1173599

Summary:	Component not shown in showdependencytree.cgi
Product:	[Community] Bugzilla	Reporter:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2>
Component:	Dependency Views	Assignee:	PnT DevOps Devs <hss-ied-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	tools-bugs <tools-bugs>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	4.5	CC:	jmcdonal, mtahir, qgong
Target Milestone:	5.0
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-02-29 06:03:58 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1215019
Bug Blocks:

Description David Woodhouse 2014-12-12 13:49:57 UTC

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1173546

I've basically filed the same bug against a whole bunch of different components.

It would be really nice if showdependencytree.cgi actually listed the component. It would be more useful than the assignee, the target and whatever that ubiquitous 'unspecified' field is.

Comment 1 Jason McDonald 2014-12-15 03:44:39 UTC

Ideally, the set of fields shown in the dependency tree would be configurable, like the set of columns in search results.  That way the user could select the fields that are most relevant for them without cluttering the tree with fields that aren't needed.

That would be a fairly large code change though, and should ideally be done upstream.

Comment 2 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2015-08-27 01:19:00 UTC

Might be worth reviewing https://github.com/bayoteers/TreeViewPlus

Comment 3 Jason McDonald 2015-08-27 03:38:22 UTC

(In reply to Jeff Fearn from comment #2)
> Might be worth reviewing https://github.com/bayoteers/TreeViewPlus

It looks interesting, but there's a rather significant caveat in the above link: "Currently TreeViewPlus extension does not follow the bug group visibility restrictions, so it might expose bug information to users outside the allowed groups. If you are using groups to restrict bug visibility, it is recommended that you do not use TreeViewPlus."

If we choose to adopt the TreeViewPlus extension we would most definitely have to fix that issue first (along with doing a security audit and penetration testing on the code).

Comment 4 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2016-02-29 06:03:58 UTC

This is covered by the bayoteers extension

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1215019 ***