Bug 1199644

Summary:	Rebase systemd to 219
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Lukáš Nykrýn <lnykryn>
Component:	systemd	Assignee:	systemd-maint
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Branislav Blaškovič <bblaskov>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.2	CC:	awshaikh, bblaskov, bugzilla.redhat.com, chris+rhbugzilla, jscotka, kvolny, lfarkas, martin, rainer.traut, redhat, sauchter, sforsyt, systemd-maint-list
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Rebase
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	systemd-219-1.el7	Doc Type:	Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-11-19 14:58:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1199645, 1199646
Bug Blocks:	1191019, 1203820, 1205796, 1249533

Description Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-03-06 21:01:38 UTC

Description of problem:
We would like to rebase systemd to newer version (219). It is really difficult and risky to backport patches from newer version to our current 208 and we have a lot of request for new features from users.

Comment 1 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-03-09 11:16:04 UTC

Test build:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lnykryn/systemd/

Comment 3 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-04-13 08:06:18 UTC

*** Bug 1210873 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 sforsyt 2015-06-25 02:24:50 UTC

I believe moving to v219 would introduce bug 1141137 and bug 1170765 to Redhat , which can cause data loss.

Can the those bugs be listed as blockers to this being committed to 7.2 ?

Comment 7 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-06-25 07:27:57 UTC

(In reply to sforsyt from comment #6)
> I believe moving to v219 would introduce bug 1141137 and bug 1170765 to
> Redhat , which can cause data loss.
> 
> Can the those bugs be listed as blockers to this being committed to 7.2 ?

Ok, lets revert this in rhel for now.

Comment 8 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-06-25 07:28:42 UTC

https://github.com/lnykryn/systemd-rhel/commit/647a7761e2fa423c6e1bd6785b043dbe7b525e3c

will be in next build

Comment 9 colin 2015-07-28 12:18:51 UTC

Thankyou Lukas. :-)

 That new piece of information suggests to me that there would be no point in me being bounced into a forced update from fc21 -> fc22 to get systemd-219

If http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10477
has not been fixed yet.

Comment 10 Branislav Blaškovič 2015-09-01 12:49:23 UTC

Current version in errata: systemd-219-11.el7

Comment 11 Karel Volný 2015-10-13 15:37:52 UTC

*** Bug 1257145 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 14:58:55 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2092.html

Comment 13 Awez 2015-11-23 12:26:32 UTC

After updating the package mentioned in the ERRATA then are we suppose to delete the "var" directory inside /var manually or the update will delete it?

Comment 14 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-11-23 12:29:45 UTC

If I am not mistaken , you have to do that manually.

Comment 15 Awez 2015-11-23 12:35:14 UTC

So here what i understand is after updating the errata all the links to /var/var/lib are connected to /var/lib and we have to delete the /var/var manually.