Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
We would like to rebase systemd to newer version (219). It is really difficult and risky to backport patches from newer version to our current 208 and we have a lot of request for new features from users.
I believe moving to v219 would introduce bug 1141137 and bug 1170765 to Redhat , which can cause data loss.
Can the those bugs be listed as blockers to this being committed to 7.2 ?
(In reply to sforsyt from comment #6)
> I believe moving to v219 would introduce bug 1141137 and bug 1170765 to
> Redhat , which can cause data loss.
>
> Can the those bugs be listed as blockers to this being committed to 7.2 ?
Ok, lets revert this in rhel for now.
Thankyou Lukas. :-)
That new piece of information suggests to me that there would be no point in me being bounced into a forced update from fc21 -> fc22 to get systemd-219
If http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10477
has not been fixed yet.
Comment 10Branislav Blaškovič
2015-09-01 12:49:23 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2092.html
After updating the package mentioned in the ERRATA then are we suppose to delete the "var" directory inside /var manually or the update will delete it?
So here what i understand is after updating the errata all the links to /var/var/lib are connected to /var/lib and we have to delete the /var/var manually.