RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1199644 - Rebase systemd to 219
Summary: Rebase systemd to 219
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: systemd
Version: 7.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: systemd-maint
QA Contact: Branislav Blaškovič
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1210873 1257145 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1199645 1199646
Blocks: 1191019 1203820 1205796 1249533
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-06 21:01 UTC by Lukáš Nykrýn
Modified: 2019-09-12 08:17 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: systemd-219-1.el7
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 14:58:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:2092 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE systemd bug fix and enhancement update 2015-11-19 12:13:57 UTC

Description Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-03-06 21:01:38 UTC 
Description of problem:
We would like to rebase systemd to newer version (219). It is really difficult and risky to backport patches from newer version to our current 208 and we have a lot of request for new features from users.
Comment 1 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-03-09 11:16:04 UTC 
Test build:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lnykryn/systemd/
Comment 3 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-04-13 08:06:18 UTC 
*** Bug 1210873 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 sforsyt 2015-06-25 02:24:50 UTC 
I believe moving to v219 would introduce bug 1141137 and bug 1170765 to Redhat , which can cause data loss.

Can the those bugs be listed as blockers to this being committed to 7.2 ?
Comment 7 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-06-25 07:27:57 UTC 
(In reply to sforsyt from comment #6)
> I believe moving to v219 would introduce bug 1141137 and bug 1170765 to
> Redhat , which can cause data loss.
> 
> Can the those bugs be listed as blockers to this being committed to 7.2 ?

Ok, lets revert this in rhel for now.
Comment 8 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-06-25 07:28:42 UTC 
https://github.com/lnykryn/systemd-rhel/commit/647a7761e2fa423c6e1bd6785b043dbe7b525e3c

will be in next build
Comment 9 colin 2015-07-28 12:18:51 UTC 
Thankyou Lukas. :-)

 That new piece of information suggests to me that there would be no point in me being bounced into a forced update from fc21 -> fc22 to get systemd-219

If http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10477
has not been fixed yet.
Comment 10 Branislav Blaškovič 2015-09-01 12:49:23 UTC 
Current version in errata: systemd-219-11.el7
Comment 11 Karel Volný 2015-10-13 15:37:52 UTC 
*** Bug 1257145 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 14:58:55 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2092.html
Comment 13 Awez 2015-11-23 12:26:32 UTC 
After updating the package mentioned in the ERRATA then are we suppose to delete the "var" directory inside /var manually or the update will delete it?
Comment 14 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-11-23 12:29:45 UTC 
If I am not mistaken , you have to do that manually.
Comment 15 Awez 2015-11-23 12:35:14 UTC 
So here what i understand is after updating the errata all the links to /var/var/lib are connected to /var/lib and we have to delete the /var/var manually.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.