Bug 1199644 – Rebase systemd to 219

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 1199644 - Rebase systemd to 219

Summary:	Rebase systemd to 219

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	systemd (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.2
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	unspecified Severity unspecified
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	systemd-maint
QA Contact:	Branislav Blaškovič
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	Rebase

Duplicates:	1210873 1257145 (view as bug list)
Depends On:	1199645 1199646
Blocks:	1191019 1205796 1203820 1249533
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2015-03-06 16:01 EST by Lukáš Nykrýn
Modified:	2015-11-23 07:35 EST (History)
CC List:	13 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	systemd-219-1.el7
Doc Type:	Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-11-19 09:58:55 EST
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2015:2092	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	systemd bug fix and enhancement update	2015-11-19 07:13:57 EST

Groups: None (edit)

Description Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-03-06 16:01:38 EST

Description of problem:
We would like to rebase systemd to newer version (219). It is really difficult and risky to backport patches from newer version to our current 208 and we have a lot of request for new features from users.

Comment 1 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-03-09 07:16:04 EDT

Test build:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lnykryn/systemd/

Comment 3 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-04-13 04:06:18 EDT

*** Bug 1210873 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 sforsyt 2015-06-24 22:24:50 EDT

I believe moving to v219 would introduce bug 1141137 and bug 1170765 to Redhat , which can cause data loss.

Can the those bugs be listed as blockers to this being committed to 7.2 ?

Comment 7 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-06-25 03:27:57 EDT

(In reply to sforsyt from comment #6)
> I believe moving to v219 would introduce bug 1141137 and bug 1170765 to
> Redhat , which can cause data loss.
> 
> Can the those bugs be listed as blockers to this being committed to 7.2 ?

Ok, lets revert this in rhel for now.

Comment 8 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-06-25 03:28:42 EDT

https://github.com/lnykryn/systemd-rhel/commit/647a7761e2fa423c6e1bd6785b043dbe7b525e3c

will be in next build

Comment 9 colin 2015-07-28 08:18:51 EDT

Thankyou Lukas. :-)

 That new piece of information suggests to me that there would be no point in me being bounced into a forced update from fc21 -> fc22 to get systemd-219

If http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10477
has not been fixed yet.

Comment 10 Branislav Blaškovič 2015-09-01 08:49:23 EDT

Current version in errata: systemd-219-11.el7

Comment 11 Karel Volný 2015-10-13 11:37:52 EDT

*** Bug 1257145 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 09:58:55 EST

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2092.html

Comment 13 Awez 2015-11-23 07:26:32 EST

After updating the package mentioned in the ERRATA then are we suppose to delete the "var" directory inside /var manually or the update will delete it?

Comment 14 Lukáš Nykrýn 2015-11-23 07:29:45 EST

If I am not mistaken , you have to do that manually.

Comment 15 Awez 2015-11-23 07:35:14 EST

So here what i understand is after updating the errata all the links to /var/var/lib are connected to /var/lib and we have to delete the /var/var manually.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.