Bug 1221635
| Summary: | add dnf config option to (not)obey weak deps | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil> |
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Honza Silhan <jsilhan> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | jan.kratochvil, jsilhan, mizdebsk, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, ppisar, rholy, sgallagh, tim.lauridsen, vkrizan, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc23 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-08-15 02:14:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-14 13:14:30 UTC
Is 'debuginfo-install' needed in all mock chroots? Otherwise it should be enough to install 'gdb' without the 'recommended' packages. mock chroots need only /usr/bin/gdb-add-index. /usr/bin/gdb-add-index is a shell script using /usr/bin/gdb. /usr/bin/gdb for its full use by users needs 'debuginfo-install'. Another topic is whether mock should be installing Recommended packages or not, feel free to reassign or file a new Bug to mock if you think so. (In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #0) > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gdb.git/commit/ > ?id=d03633a0c051f7f636d7bdca66d397705d7e12bc > already uses: > Recommends: dnf-command(debuginfo-install) From gdb POV you're doing it right. In same cases whole dnf-plugins-core are unnecessary. The question is whether to separate just this plugin or all of them and make dnf-plugins a group with mandatory packages from core and optional from extras. We will figure out. > I have no idea if Requires of 'debuginfo-install' would be smaller than the > current Requires of whole 'dnf-plugins-core'. It will be. (In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #2) > Another topic is whether mock should be installing Recommended packages or > not, feel free to reassign or file a new Bug to mock if you think so. Then we would need to file the bug for DNF first to allow/disallow pulling in weak dep packages. I am changing it to bug report for dnf config option to forbit installation of weak deps. *** Bug 1229701 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc23,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc23,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 23. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc23,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc23,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc23 dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 Package dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22, dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22, hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22 dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22 hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13162/dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 then log in and leave karma (feedback). dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22, hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22, dnf-1.1.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc23, hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc23, dnf-1.1.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. I would expect a `builddep` command to skip downloading weak dependencies by default. Then the mock (bug 1254634) did not need to change... and probably other tools that download a build dependencies (e.g. scripts to build RPM outside of mock). Or, will it break something? Skipping weak dependencies may have an CLI option, e.g. --skip-weak, for users' to find out that this feature exist and for ease of use when doing a minimal install. Thank you for any info. |