Bug 124029
Summary: | Anaconda crashes on doPostInstall with /dev/null Input/output error | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dag Wieers <dag> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 2 | CC: | developer, smueller |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-02-21 19:03:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dag Wieers
2004-05-23 00:48:37 UTC
Now knowing if this is relevant to this problem, but it seems serious enough to report. After installation on tty4 the screen is filled with following messages: <6>attempt to access beyond end of device <6>ram0: rw=0, want=4262982920, limit=32768 <3>Buffer I/O error on device ram0, logical block 2131491459 <6>attempt to access beyond end of device <6>ram0: rw=0, want=5401674258, limit=32768 <3>Buffer I/O error on device ram0, logical block 2700837128 .... A defaul installation results in the same problem. A "ls -la /dev/null" results in a "ls: /dev/null: Input/output error". The same output in tty4. It may be related to the problem reported in bugzilla #122215, where, although my 2 disks are configured in RAID1, Linux still allows to use them as sda/sdb. *** Bug 124030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** After another test, I noticed the following weirdness: # ls -la /dev/tty0 ?--------- 29797 19629342 5401632 0 Dec 10 2023 /dev/tty0 # ls -la /dev/tty6 c-----x-w- 0 8224 129 0, 3 Jan 1 1970 /dev/tty6 # ls -la /dev/tty8 ?rwx-----T 82 21044921 5405920 0 Jan 1 1970 /dev/tty8 # ls -la /dev/ttyS1 br-s-wS--T 28257 26478 28015 32, 97 Mar 23 1987 /dev/ttyS1 Most of the other files seem correct, only /dev/tty* and /dev/zero seem to be corrupt. Doing ls -la in /dev results in lots of devices generating an error, like: ls: ./sunmouse: Input/output error ls: ./kbd: Input/output error ls: ./ptyp0: Input/output error ... for: sunmouse, kbd, ptyp* agpgart, fd*, sg0, st0, random, urandom, nvram, adb, rtc, fb*, null, ttyS0, ttyS2, openprom, tty5, tty7 The ISO files have a correct md5sum, and the installation works without any problems (except the post-install). I have tried using kernel option 'allowcddma' and using less memory than the 1GB provided. The system worked flawlessly with FC1 (i386) for a couple of months. A new attempt using only mem=128M (instead of previous attempts using mem=512M) ended successful. The previously mentioned 'attempt to access beyond end of device' messages for /dev/ram0 did not manifest and /dev/null (and other devices) were properly defined. So for some reason using 512M or 1GB of memory corrupts the ramfs driver. Could you run with memtest86+ and see if it shows any problems? Yes, I already did that. memtest86+ works without reporting any problems. The hardware-specs: + AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (2Ghz) + Abit KV8-MAX3 v1.0 + 2 SATA disks in RAID1, SiL 3114 chipset + 1024GB RAM Initially the system was unstable, most people with this hardware (and the v1.0 mainboard) reported this problem. The solution was to run your DDR 400 memory at 333Mhz, since then the system was rock stable. 1GB RAM of course. Confirm same behavior as Dag Wieers reported (error with /dev/null). AMD Athlon 64FX system, ASUS SK8V motherboard, 1GB RAM, single SATA hard disk (/dev/hde). Error always reproducable. Messages: <6>attempt to access beyond end of device <6>ram0: rw=0, want=8589934592, limit=18432 <3>Buffer I/O error on device ram0, logical block 4294967295 I have to say that since the successful installation using mem=128M the system has worked rock-stable. So I doubt the cause is flacky hardware or memory problems. Vladimir, could you check if that works for you too ? 128 MB was not enough for a graphic install. Tried with mem=256M and got it installed finally. Posting this from the new system :) There seems to be several bugzilla entries with the same theme. 123564, 123692, 123745, 125874, 127128 125502 and 125198 also seem related I have been encountering the same problem and you suggestion of installing with mem=256M did the trick. The install was much slower. This is probably due to less CDROM caching available. I installed everything and this install required all 4 FC 2 CDs. At two different points in the install anaconda reported that a package had not been installed and it might be a bad CD, but also prompted to hit enter to try again. I hit enter and the retries seemed to work. The media passed the verification tests on install and I have successfully used the media to install on different HW. The difference I can note from your configurations is a different MB. I am using the following: MB: Tyan Tomcat K8S(S2850G2N) Processor: AMD Opteron 146 (2GHz) RAM: 1 GB HD: Maxtor 80GB 7200 RPM IDE ULTRA ATA 133 This system also worked flawlessly with FC1 (i386) for a couple of months. I had this same problem with Fedora Core 2 on x86_64. The hardware is a Opteron 242 based system on a Tyan S2885 motherboard. I am trying the mem=256M option now to see if it fixes it. What is really odd is that I used the same installation media on the same system before and had a flawless install. Despite this, I am now having the problem described in this bug and it is happening with every install attempt no matter what options I use (e.g. package selections, install types, etc.) One thing to note is that the system install failure is occurring during a wipe and reinstall over an previously working FC2 install. My system details are: MB: Tyan K8W S2885 Processor: AMD Opteron 242 (1.6GHz) RAM: 1GB HD: 2 74GB Western Digital SATA HDs, 1 20GB Seagate Barracuda on the EIDE I just tried the mem=256M option for the installer, and the installation process worked without a hitch. The installation seemed to be a bit slower granted, but at least it didn't error out. In addition to the Tyan Tomcat MB I listed in an earlier post, I also have a Tyan 2885... MB: Tyan K8W(S2885ANRF) Processors: 2 AMD Opteron 244 (1.8GHz) RAM: 2GB total - 1GB for each processor HD: Maxtor 160GB 7200 RPM IDE ULTRA ATA 133 I used the same media to install on this machine without a hitch, but I thnk this was a full install over a previously working FC1 (not FC2) install or on a fresh disk (I can't remember for sure, but I would guess the former i.e. over FC2), and I didn't need the mem=256M option in this case. I installed over a FC1 install on the Tomcat MB, but can't remember if there was some other problem with the first attempt that lead me to try again, so I can't really comment on your "related to overwriting a previous FC2 install" guess. I would be willing to reinstall FC1 on the box then try FC2 again on the Tomcat box without the mem=256M option if someone thought that would help solve the problem. Fortunately for me (unfortunately for the purpose of debugging) the 2885 is working well for me and I do not want to experiment with this productive machine. *** Bug 132255 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I have a server with the ASUS SK8V mainboard, AMD Opteron 240 (1.4GHz) and 1024MB ram (2 modules). After I read this articles here, i took out one ram module and tried to install FC2. Finally it worked werry well. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 119447 *** Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated. |