Bug 1251027
Summary: | lightdm-1.10.5 failed | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | poma <pomidorabelisima> | ||||||||||
Component: | lightdm | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> | ||||||||||
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||
Version: | 23 | CC: | christoph.wickert, dcbw, jklimes, kevin, lkundrak, nonamedotc, rdieter | ||||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||||||
URL: | http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/lightdm/2015-July/000815.html | ||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2015-09-01 18:47:06 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
poma
2015-08-06 12:39:54 UTC
Created attachment 1059930 [details]
Connection add failed
(In reply to poma from comment #0) > How reproducible: > > Thursdays, Fridays, sometimes on Mondays. > ;-) > Actual results: > > Connection add failed > No session found for uid 1000 (unknown) > Can you get NetworkManager logs when you hit the issue? Do you have a proper logind session registered? What's the output of loginctl list-sessions loginctl session-status <session id> Created attachment 1062285 [details]
loginctl list-sessions
NM works but liveuser can't manage.
Dan Williams, Jirka Klimes and Lubomir Rintel do not help at all. Let's see whether Kevin Fenzi, Mukundan Ragavan, Christoph Wickert or Rex Dieter would be of any help. Created attachment 1066021 [details]
Connection add failed 2
What's up Wolfgang Hmm, i'm able to create a network connection with nm-applet as liveuser. Tested with latest mate nightly build from today and network-manager-applet-1.4.0-2. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10795666 I'm using qemu-kvm with virtual-manager. Thursdays, Fridays, sometimes on Mondays. :) Ok, i will test this. Thanks for testing, see if you can reproduce via DHCP server static lease hostnamed "fedora2364", for your virtual machine. (In reply to poma from comment #10) > Thanks for testing, > see if you can reproduce via DHCP server static lease hostnamed > "fedora2364", for your virtual machine. I use the the builtin dhcp server, here i can't configure a static lease. (In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #11) > (In reply to poma from comment #10) > > Thanks for testing, > > see if you can reproduce via DHCP server static lease hostnamed > > "fedora2364", for your virtual machine. > > I use the the builtin dhcp server, here i can't configure a static lease. Is the "builtin" - dhcp server within the actual router? For this specific test case, here's the minimal working dhcpd config on the host machine, runs side by side with the dhcpd on the actual router without problemos. # yum install dhcp-server # cat /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { option routers 192.168.1.2; option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8; } host fedora-vm { option host-name "fedora2364"; hardware ethernet 52:54:00:12:34:56; fixed-address 192.168.1.99; } # systemctl start dhcpd.service Of course, set the IP and MAC addresses given what is used there. See is it gonna cause loss of desktop session, as here. Tested with Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-23-20150824.iso The lack of a login session in systemd-logind seems to be the issue here... When you see this could you do a: sudo journalctl -u systemd-logind -l and look for any errors? lightdm should have a session, then when you login it should show a session for your user being added. For $ journalctl --version | head -1 systemd 222 $ man 1 journalctl ... The old options -l/--full are not useful anymore, except to undo --no-full. also "sudo" is unnecessary $ grep wheel /etc/group wheel:x:10:liveuser so you are probably thinking of $ journalctl -u systemd-logind --no-pager This is a Fedora 23, if you have not noticed. First, will wait for confirmation of the bug from Wolfgang, if possible, then will deal with the rest. In the meantime, you can test yourself. Why did you re-asigng this to mate-session-manger? As i mentioned before i don't see this issue. Sorry, i use the builtin dhcp server from virtual-manager, v-m use as default virtual network (bridged) for VMs, and everything works well. Maybe you have an issue with your dhcp config? Did you ever test this on bare metal? Again, i can't reproduce this with mate livecd!!!!!!!!! I tried F23 Alpha live ISO - XFCE. The problem does not appear when booting, but it can be triggered by logging out and logging in again. Then the session goes to closing state and is not among ONLINE_SESSIONS any more. Even if loginctl lists it. (cat /run/systemd/users/1000) Created attachment 1066771 [details]
session details when booting, and after log out/log in
True, it is one of the test scenarios to reproduce this specific bug(In reply to Jirka Klimes from comment #16) > I tried F23 Alpha live ISO - XFCE. The problem does not appear when booting, > but it can be triggered by logging out and logging in again. Then the > session goes to closing state and is not among ONLINE_SESSIONS any more. > Even if loginctl lists it. (cat /run/systemd/users/1000) True, it is one of the test scenarios to reproduce this specific bug. Actually it is more incompleteness of certain component caused by the "release rush", rather than common bug. The common denominator for Xfce and MATE is LightDM. 1.10.4 release from the 1.10 series released 2014-11-13 1.10.5 release from the 1.10 series released 2015-03-10 lightdm-1.10.5-1.fc24 lightdm-1.10.4-8.fc23 Where is 1.10.5 for Fedora 23? Besides, latest stable serie is 1.14 http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/lightdm/2015-March/000776.html Besides... we've been over this before, fedora currently and purposely is tracking the lightdm-1.10.x LTS branch 1.10.5 builds are on the way (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #22) > Besides... we've been over this before, fedora currently and purposely is > tracking the lightdm-1.10.x LTS branch > And ... you still have not understood. https://getfedora.org/ Freedom. Friends. Features. First. Long Term Support aka LTS is exactly the opposite of the First - Latest and Greatest. Long Term Support aka LTS is concept characteristic to RHEL, Ubuntu X.Y.Z LTS or WhatNotLTS, but not to Fedora. 1.10.5, you really think this will help us. Unlike Fedora, your motto looks like Constipation. Insulation. Featureless. Antediluvian. (In reply to poma from comment #23) > (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #22) > > Besides... we've been over this before, fedora currently and purposely is > > tracking the lightdm-1.10.x LTS branch > > > > And ... you still have not understood. > > https://getfedora.org/ > Freedom. Friends. Features. First. > > Long Term Support aka LTS is exactly the opposite of the First - Latest and > Greatest. > > Long Term Support aka LTS is concept characteristic to RHEL, Ubuntu X.Y.Z > LTS or WhatNotLTS, but not to Fedora. > > 1.10.5, you really think this will help us. > > Unlike Fedora, your motto looks like > Constipation. Insulation. Featureless. Antediluvian. Pardon me, your - as lightdm packager - motto looks like ... what can not be said for Qt/KDE part of your maintenance. Fascinating, isn't it. Sorry you feel that way, but I do not have an infinite amount of time. I can only choose how to spend the time I have and I choose to focus it elsewhere. See also previous comments that are still relevant: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091899#c17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091899#c19 I feel your mentioning it here (again), is not constructive or helpful. What is constructive, I'm open to comaintainers to help. Very much encourage it actually. to repeat: "You're welcome to help maintain lightdm, if you want to steer things in a different direction." Same breakage with: lightdm-1.10.5-1.fc23.x86_64 lightdm-gobject-1.10.5-1.fc23.x86_64 Has anyone read the reference I left? If so, is it understandable what is written there? Your feedback about lack of a 1.10.5 update seemed to imply to me that you thought it would help. Apparently that is not the case. Re-reading the referenced upstream thread makes it look like this is still an unresolved issue, but it's not clear to me what should be fixed... lightdm or systemd.
It is a great explanation of the mechanism segment from Robert Ancell,
and it is not about the actual solution, but I think it was helpful in solving the problem.
If you go out of there toward "Previous message:" you'll find a reference to a discussion between 500 and dh.herrmann.
When and if you read the whole discussion, pay attention to the lightdm version used in all of the tests.
I do not know if you're aware, but upstream developers generally always ask and almost always expect the latest version or it could easily happen to put you on ignore.
Therefore, you will have to check yourself whether the current solution really applies to this ancient version of your.
--
I hope you understand now, at least a little bit more, why it is good to have Latest and Greatest.
BTW Ubuntu developers - lightdm and systemd - have missed this particular problem, just 500 caught it, haha.
At least they were honest and some thanked.
For the reference, what is used now:
lightdm-1.15.3-2.fc22.x86_64
lightdm-gtk-2.0.1-3.fc22.x86_64
>= lightdm 1.15.2 support Wayland sessions.
with Fedora-Live-MATE_Compiz-x86_64-23_Beta-TC1 After a logout/login of the liveuser the network connection is lost, but i'm able to create a new one with normal dhcp server from virtual-manager. For me it is acceptable to restart the live image to have again a network connection or create a new one, .... a livecd is an installer image and not for everyday usage. Speaking of "Cutting off the Branch You're Sitting on". Do you really think it's okay for Fedora to present itself with a broken functionality, whatever it is!? Some people never learn. BTW, Rex Dieter have you found the solution? (In reply to poma from comment #31) > Speaking of "Cutting off the Branch You're Sitting on". > > Do you really think it's okay for Fedora to present itself with a broken > functionality, whatever it is!? No, but do you realy think this will fix? (In reply to poma from comment #32) > Some people never learn. what's wrong with you? ...i'm out....no need to have your explosions in my mailbox :) Re: comment #32 Sorry, no solution from me. I assure you, when/if I do, I'll report it here. (In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #33) > (In reply to poma from comment #31) > > Speaking of "Cutting off the Branch You're Sitting on". > > > > Do you really think it's okay for Fedora to present itself with a broken > > functionality, whatever it is!? > No, but do you realy think this will fix? > You think the fix is in the mix? > > (In reply to poma from comment #32) > > Some people never learn. > what's wrong with you? Maybe inspiring comments from you. Running away, already? (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #34) > Re: comment #32 > > Sorry, no solution from me. I assure you, when/if I do, I'll report it here. Good luck, man. > Running away, already?
s.m.d
(In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #37) > > Running away, already? > > s.m.d Wolfgang Ulbrich, if you are afraid to write a full sentence, then you do not have anything to "suck". I called you here - you as maintainer of MATE - to help us here, not to play the "semi-retard" role. poma, wolfgang tried to remove himself from the situation, and you keep re-adding him... what you are doing is hard to characterize as anything but harrassment at this point. Please stop with any comments that are anything but adding technical details about the bug in question. If in doubt, I encourage you to (re)read https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #39) > poma, wolfgang tried to remove himself from the situation, and you keep > re-adding him... "remove himself from the situation" - what is that supposed to mean!? BTW s.m.d aka "suck my dick" is a common greeting in Europe - If in doubt? Your patronizing attempt is really pathetic, Rex Dieter. Wolfgang Ulbrich, I expect from you a sincere apology. poma, let it rest, please. The ticket history is not on your side: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=1251027 What you've been trying will lead to nothing. You are in no position to force anyone, and readding people to Cc is just rude. The damage is done. Consider starting with an apology yourself, and maybe that will fix things a bit, at least. (In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment #42) > poma, let it rest, please. > > The ticket history is not on your side: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=1251027 > > What you've been trying will lead to nothing. You are in no position to > force anyone, and readding people to Cc is just rude. > > The damage is done. Consider starting with an apology yourself, and maybe > that will fix things a bit, at least. Very funny from you, I have to admit. Even you approve of this "European - If in doubt" greeting!? BTW how are you, long time no see, maestro. |