Bug 1262095
| Summary: | [RFE] Aysnc RBD Mirroring | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Sean Cohen <scohen> |
| Component: | RBD | Assignee: | Jason Dillaman <jdillama> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Hemanth Kumar <hyelloji> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Bara Ancincova <bancinco> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 1.3.1 | CC: | ceph-eng-bugs, flucifre, hnallurv, icolle, jdillama, jdurgin, kdreyer, vumrao |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | 2.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | https://wiki.ceph.com/Planning/Blueprints/Infernalis/RBD_Async_Mirroring | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph v10.2.0 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: |
.Block Device mirroring is now supported
The RADOS Block Device (RBD) mirroring feature has been added to the Red Hat Ceph Storage 2. RBD mirroring is a process of replicating Ceph Block Device images between two peer Ceph Storage Clusters. The mirroring is asynchronous, crash-consistent, and serves primarily for disaster recovery.
To learn more about RBD mirroring, see the https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-ceph-storage/2/single/block-device-guide/#block_device_mirroring[Block Device Mirroring] chapter in the https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-ceph-storage/2/single/block-device-guide/[Block Device] guide for Red Hat Ceph Storage 2.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-08-23 19:26:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1201698, 1283413, 1322504 | ||
|
Description
Sean Cohen
2015-09-10 19:31:47 UTC
There will be a new daemon "rbd-mirror" that runs on a separate server, similar to how we isolate RGW on its own node(s). It is essentially a client to the cluster, so same constraints as RGW. Looks good to me -- only minor comment is perhaps mention that it is asynchronous and crash consistent mirroring? Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1755 |