Bug 1262117

Summary: [RFE] Swift Object Versioning support
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Neil Levine <nlevine>
Component: RGWAssignee: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: shilpa <smanjara>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Bara Ancincova <bancinco>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.3.1CC: cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, hnallurv, icolle, kbader, kdreyer, mbenjamin, owasserm, sweil, uboppana, yehuda
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: 2.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-10.2.5-7.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.5-3redhat1xenial Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.The Ceph Object Gateway now supports the Swift object versioning The Ceph Object Gateway now supports the Swift object versioning APIs, including correct handling of the `X-Versions-Location` header. The `X-History-Location` header is not supported. The object versioning is an object-native version control mechanism of Swift object storage, and is a required capability for RefStack conformance. For details, see the https://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_object_versioning.html[Object Versioning] section of the OpenStack documentation.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-14 15:43:28 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1412948    

Description Neil Levine 2015-09-10 20:20:58 UTC
Implement Swift object versioning, which is different to S3 versioning, in RGW

Comment 2 Neil Levine 2015-09-23 18:57:26 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1262118 ***

Comment 3 Neil Levine 2015-10-02 20:30:24 UTC
No idea why I marked this as a dup so reopening.

Comment 7 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-01-09 17:07:35 UTC
From the upstream tickets, this feature looks ready in Ceph v10.2.5 upstream (the version we intend to ship in RH Ceph Storage 2.2). Is that right Yehuda?

Comment 8 Yehuda Sadeh 2017-01-09 17:28:36 UTC
yes

Comment 9 Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2017-01-11 13:52:41 UTC
(In reply to Yehuda Sadeh from comment #8)
> yes

ok, devel acked

Comment 16 shilpa 2017-02-28 10:10:21 UTC
Looks good to me.

Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2017-03-14 15:43:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0514.html