Bug 1262117 - [RFE] Swift Object Versioning support
Summary: [RFE] Swift Object Versioning support
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RGW
Version: 1.3.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 2.2
Assignee: Yehuda Sadeh
QA Contact: shilpa
Bara Ancincova
Depends On:
Blocks: 1412948
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2015-09-10 20:20 UTC by Neil Levine
Modified: 2020-04-15 14:16 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-10.2.5-7.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.5-3redhat1xenial
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.The Ceph Object Gateway now supports the Swift object versioning The Ceph Object Gateway now supports the Swift object versioning APIs, including correct handling of the `X-Versions-Location` header. The `X-History-Location` header is not supported. The object versioning is an object-native version control mechanism of Swift object storage, and is a required capability for RefStack conformance. For details, see the https://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_object_versioning.html[Object Versioning] section of the OpenStack documentation.
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2017-03-14 15:43:28 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 8221 None None None 2016-09-19 11:07:06 UTC
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 15925 None None None 2016-09-19 11:07:31 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:0514 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Ceph Storage 2.2 bug fix and enhancement update 2017-03-21 07:24:26 UTC

Description Neil Levine 2015-09-10 20:20:58 UTC
Implement Swift object versioning, which is different to S3 versioning, in RGW

Comment 2 Neil Levine 2015-09-23 18:57:26 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1262118 ***

Comment 3 Neil Levine 2015-10-02 20:30:24 UTC
No idea why I marked this as a dup so reopening.

Comment 7 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-01-09 17:07:35 UTC
From the upstream tickets, this feature looks ready in Ceph v10.2.5 upstream (the version we intend to ship in RH Ceph Storage 2.2). Is that right Yehuda?

Comment 8 Yehuda Sadeh 2017-01-09 17:28:36 UTC

Comment 9 Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2017-01-11 13:52:41 UTC
(In reply to Yehuda Sadeh from comment #8)
> yes

ok, devel acked

Comment 16 shilpa 2017-02-28 10:10:21 UTC
Looks good to me.

Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2017-03-14 15:43:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.