Bug 1262118
Summary: | [RFE] Swift Object Expiration support | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Neil Levine <nlevine> |
Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | shilpa <smanjara> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Bara Ancincova <bancinco> |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 1.3.1 | CC: | cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, flucifre, hnallurv, icolle, kbader, kdreyer, mbenjamin, nlevine, owasserm, sweil, vumrao, yehuda, yweinste |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | 2.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: |
.Swift Object Expiration is now supported
Ceph now supports expiration of Swift objects.
For details see the http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_expiring_objects.html[Expiring Object Support] section of the OpenStack documentation.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-08-23 19:26:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1322504 |
Description
Neil Levine
2015-09-10 20:23:02 UTC
Do we really want it for 1.3.2? Is a backport too difficult or too risky? *** Bug 1262117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Feature testing is complete. Doc text looks fine. Moving to verified Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1755 |