Bug 1262118

Summary: [RFE] Swift Object Expiration support
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Neil Levine <nlevine>
Component: RGWAssignee: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: shilpa <smanjara>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Bara Ancincova <bancinco>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.3.1CC: cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, flucifre, hnallurv, icolle, kbader, kdreyer, mbenjamin, nlevine, owasserm, sweil, vumrao, yehuda, yweinste
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 2.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Swift Object Expiration is now supported Ceph now supports expiration of Swift objects. For details see the http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_expiring_objects.html[Expiring Object Support] section of the OpenStack documentation.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-23 19:26:55 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1322504    

Description Neil Levine 2015-09-10 20:23:02 UTC
Implement Swift object expiration.

Comment 2 Yehuda Sadeh 2015-09-22 18:09:43 UTC
Do we really want it for 1.3.2?

Comment 3 Neil Levine 2015-09-22 18:50:04 UTC
Is a backport too difficult or too risky?

Comment 4 Neil Levine 2015-09-23 18:57:26 UTC
*** Bug 1262117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 shilpa 2016-08-02 08:51:23 UTC
Feature testing is complete. Doc text looks fine. Moving to verified

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2016-08-23 19:26:55 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1755