Bug 1270102
| Summary: | udev rules need to be fixed (obsolete plugdev->uaccess tag) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Przemek Klosowski <przemek> | ||||
| Component: | libsigrok | Assignee: | Alex G. <mr.nuke.me> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | dan, fedora, mr.nuke.me | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| URL: | http://sigrok.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=665 | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | libsigrok-0.3.0-4.fc23 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-01-20 21:56:37 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Przemek Klosowski
2015-10-09 01:35:56 UTC
The fix is simple: replacing the old GROUP/MODE settings with TAG+="uaccess" The /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsigrok.rules file is already ordered before 70-uaccess.rules so no further changes are necessary. I enclose the patch, which should be sent upstream. Created attachment 1081151 [details]
60-libsigrok.rules patch to use uaccess tag
for upstream acceptance - is the uaccess tag systemd specific thing or a general mechanism? I believe it's systemd specific, but everyone uses systemd now, right? in particular, plugdev comes from Debian but they switched to systemd too, with wheezy. BTW, I filed a related bug for openOCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270106 I've notified upstream. I'd like to get their input before we start patching our release. Re. Comment 6: in the upstream bug report you say that you don't see problems with sigrok on the latest Fedora---but it it possible that you manually created group plugdev and added yourself to it? Without that, I believe it cannot work. Eliminating plugdev has been on the agenda for a while now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785729 More bug reports with background on why plugdev should go away: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815093 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859244 I've encountered this bug also (I am running Fedora 23 and its a fairly recent install so there's no plugdev group). I'd just like to confirm that the patch in comment 2 resolves the issue for me. Specifically without the change pulseview cannot find my FX2 based logic analyzer. Once I updated the udev rules and went through a hotplug cycle everything worked great. libsigrok-0.3.0-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e837dcccc6 libsigrok-0.3.0-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e837dcccc6 libsigrok-0.3.0-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |