Bug 1279463

Summary: [Beaker] reserve reporting limited options
Product: [Retired] Beaker Reporter: Jeff Burke <jburke>
Component: reportsAssignee: beaker-dev-list
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: tools-bugs <tools-bugs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 21CC: dcallagh, mjia, rjoost
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-11 00:33:17 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jeff Burke 2015-11-09 14:12:05 UTC
Description of problem:
 When using the reserve report I would like to have additional tables available when building the Reserve Report.
Currently it only has: Loaned To, Name, Owner, Type, user

 We currently have systems that are permanently allocated to the developers. 
In the lender field we have kernel-hw-dev. I would like to filter those out of this report.

https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/reports/?reservesearch-0.table=Name&reservesearch-0.operation=contains&reservesearch-0.value=%25.bos.redhat.com&reservesearch-1.table=Type&reservesearch-1.operation=is&reservesearch-1.value=Machine&reservesearch-2.table=Owner&reservesearch-2.operation=contains&reservesearch-2.value=kernel-hw

Comment 1 Jeff Burke 2015-11-09 15:06:27 UTC
Is it possible to add system pool to the selectable table?

Comment 2 Roman Joost 2015-12-09 03:41:13 UTC
Dear Jeff,

I'd like to move the conversation in regards to what we show on the reserve report to Bug 623562 since that will be the RFE which should deliver what is requested on this item.

May I ask if I can close this report in favour of Bug 623562?

Comment 3 Jeff Burke 2015-12-09 12:36:29 UTC
Hi Roman,
 No problem. Please close this BZ. We can discuss on Bug 623562 if need be.

Thanks,
Jeff

Comment 4 Roman Joost 2015-12-11 00:33:17 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 623562 ***