Bug 1288804 (python-pysegbase)

Summary: Review Request: python-pysegbase - 3D graph cut segmentation
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Julien Enselme <jujens>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jujens, miroslav.jirik, package-review, zbyszek
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-01-09 15:22:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 1276837, 1288796    
Bug Blocks: 1276941    

Description Igor Gnatenko 2015-12-06 03:10:38 UTC
Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-pysegbase.spec
SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-pysegbase-1.1.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Segmentation tools based on the graph cut algorithm.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain

Comment 1 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2015-12-08 22:23:56 UTC
This looks like another fatality of gco...

Comment 2 Julien Enselme 2016-01-09 13:29:18 UTC
While building you package in mock, I encountered the following error:
No matching package to install: 'python2-pygco'
No matching package to install: 'python3-pygco'


I think your package requires https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pygco/0.0.5 which is not packaged in fedora yet. Can you please solve this? You can assign me to the review if you want.

Comment 3 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-01-09 14:44:40 UTC
It's usually helpful to read older comments...

Comment 4 Julien Enselme 2016-01-09 15:14:48 UTC
> It's usually helpful to read older comments...

OK, just read the closed deps. From what I understand, this review should be closed as CANTFIX, no?

Comment 5 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-01-09 15:16:23 UTC
I thought so, but I don't know enough about the codebase to decide if gco dependency is mandatory, or can maybe replaced by something else, etc.

Comment 6 Julien Enselme 2016-01-09 15:22:15 UTC
> I don't know enough about the codebase to decide if gco dependency is mandatory, or can maybe replaced by something else, etc.

In that case, I think you should see with the developers of pysegbase. For now, I am closing this review as DEFERRED. Feel free to reopen it once the dependency problem is solved.

Comment 7 Miroslav Jirik 2016-04-14 14:05:05 UTC
Hi, I am the author of pysegbase. I want to confirm that pygco is indeed required to run pysegbase.

pygco package can be installed from pypi with:

pip install pygco

Unfortunately there is no rpm package. :-(

Comment 8 Igor Gnatenko 2016-04-14 14:13:15 UTC
(In reply to Miroslav Jirik from comment #7)
> Hi, I am the author of pysegbase. I want to confirm that pygco is indeed
> required to run pysegbase.
> 
> pygco package can be installed from pypi with:
> 
> pip install pygco
> 
> Unfortunately there is no rpm package. :-(

problem with gco itself. Read https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288766