Bug 1289067

Summary:	[RFE][UX] visual separation of autoremoved packages
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michal Luscon <mluscon>
Component:	dnf	Assignee:	rpm-software-management
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	jpazdziora, jsilhan, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, vmukhame
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	EasyFix, FutureFeature, Reopened, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	dnf-2.0	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-10-04 19:15:01 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michal Luscon 2015-12-07 11:32:22 UTC

Example of the output:

$ dnf remove ekiga
Dependencies resolved.
=============================================================
Removing:
 ekiga                 x86_64 4.0.1-17.fc22   @fedora   19 M
Removing unused dependencies:
 evolution-data-server x86_64 3.16.5-1.fc22   @updates  14 M
 geocode-glib          x86_64 3.16.2-1.fc22   @fedora  160 k
 gnome-online-accounts x86_64 3.16.4.1-1.fc22 @updates 4.0 M
 libgdata              x86_64 0.17.3-1.fc22   @updates 1.7 M

Comment 1 Michal Luscon 2016-03-14 13:04:39 UTC

*** Bug 1316048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-07-08 09:24:56 UTC

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 3 Honza Silhan 2016-08-02 08:38:24 UTC

I believe this is implemented in the upstream.

Comment 4 Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat) 2016-08-02 09:04:58 UTC

Reopening -- dnf-2.0 is not available in https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/d/ -- there is still only dnf-1.1.9-3.fc25.noarch.rpm there.

Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#CLOSED the bugzilla should be CLOSED when the fix is available in rawhide or the updates repo.

Maybe you meant to use POST?

Comment 5 Igor Gnatenko 2016-08-02 09:11:06 UTC

We use RHBZ to track upstream issues. DNF 2.0 will be available very soon.

Comment 6 Jan Pazdziora (Red Hat) 2016-08-02 11:46:11 UTC

This is great. But this was filed against Fedora rawhide, the problem is present in Fedora rawhide, people saw this bugzilla and did not file a duplicate one because they expected proper Fedora handling.

You cannot just come and start claiming that Fedora guidelines do not apply here.