Bug 129014
Summary: | Rebuilding of sed always fails | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
Component: | sed | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | Keywords: | EasyFix |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 4.1.2-4 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-10-08 11:25:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 123268 |
Description
Robert Scheck
2004-08-03 00:05:15 UTC
The LANG problem fixed differently (and submitted upstream) in 4.1.2-4. I'm not going to change the requirements on glibc (in fact I have added even a Requires as well), as there were too many regex bugs in earlier glibc releases. For those glibcs you should probably remove --without-included-regex, but the Fedora rpms really want to use it. I still have to comment your part about the glibc requirement: I'm able to rebuild 4.1.2-4 against a glibc (2.3.2-11.9) out of Red Hat Linux 9 for example (and everything is working without restrictions), so I think the requirement to such a new glibc is just foobar...if you think you need to require a actual glibc, 2.3.2-27 (not 2.3.3-27!) is absolutely more than enough... If you look at glibc ChangeLog between 2.3.2-27.* and 2.3.3-27, there were more than 100 separate changes to regex code, many of them fixing really serious bugs. |