Bug 1297499
| Summary: | CF 3.2: Automation code throwing "0x000... is recycled object" exceptions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | John Prause <jprause> |
| Component: | Automate | Assignee: | mkanoor |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Milan Falešník <mfalesni> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.4.0 | CC: | cpelland, dajohnso, gmccullo, james.beal, jhardy, jocarter, mfeifer, mkanoor, obarenbo, simaishi, tfitzger |
| Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | 5.5.3 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.5.3.2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Previously, the CloudForms Management Engine used a custom mechanism to cache objects sent as references to the Automate methods. However, some of the objects were not cached by the mechanism, resulting in Distributed Ruby (DRb) recycled object errors. DRb has a built-in caching mechanism based on TimerIdConv, so this release of Red Hat CloudForms will use DRb's caching mechanism instead to avoid these errors.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 1297097 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2016-04-13 18:41:04 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1297097, 1297952 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Comment 2
mkanoor
2016-02-04 14:56:46 UTC
New commit detected on cfme/5.5.z: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/gitweb?p=cfme.git;a=commitdiff;h=eb36c3a6049ceaa2b3bad6e33e837ee93f74c395 commit eb36c3a6049ceaa2b3bad6e33e837ee93f74c395 Author: Madhu Kanoor <mkanoor> AuthorDate: Thu Jan 14 17:09:23 2016 -0500 Commit: Madhu Kanoor <mkanoor> CommitDate: Mon Jan 18 17:03:21 2016 -0500 Use DRb's builtin caching mechanism https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297499 Previously we have been using our own caching mechanism to cache objects sent as references to the Automate Methods. We have gotten DRb recycled object errors, since some of the objects which were sent as references were not being cached. DRb has a builtin caching mechanism based on TimerIdConv, which we are starting to use in this PR. Conflicts: spec/lib/miq_automation_engine/miq_ae_service_spec.rb lib/miq_automation_engine/engine/miq_ae_method.rb | 8 ++++++++ lib/miq_automation_engine/engine/miq_ae_service.rb | 2 +- spec/lib/miq_automation_engine/miq_ae_service_spec.rb | 9 --------- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) New commit detected on cfme/5.5.z: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/gitweb?p=cfme.git;a=commitdiff;h=67e439f3b408f4c393a3e98668c702a5240ada13 commit 67e439f3b408f4c393a3e98668c702a5240ada13 Merge: cecc8aa eb36c3a Author: Greg McCullough <gmccullo> AuthorDate: Wed Feb 10 14:25:46 2016 -0500 Commit: Greg McCullough <gmccullo> CommitDate: Wed Feb 10 14:25:46 2016 -0500 Merge branch 'bugzilla_1297499_5_5_z' into '5.5.z' Use DRb's builtin caching mechanism https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297499 Previously we have been using our own caching mechanism to cache objects sent as references to the Automate Methods. We have gotten DRb recycled object errors, since some of the objects which were sent as references were not being cached. DRb has a builtin caching mechanism based on TimerIdConv, which we are starting to use in this PR. Conflicts: spec/lib/miq_automation_engine/miq_ae_service_spec.rb Not a clean cherry pick for the above file, tests were being removed which didn't exist in 5.5 Original PR https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/6190 Only one commit from the PR has been used See merge request !727 lib/miq_automation_engine/engine/miq_ae_method.rb | 8 ++++++++ lib/miq_automation_engine/engine/miq_ae_service.rb | 2 +- spec/lib/miq_automation_engine/miq_ae_service_spec.rb | 9 --------- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) *** Bug 1304859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Checked in 5.5.3.2. After discussion with mkanoor I used the script from [1] which I ran about a dozen times and no error ever happened. The provisioning also works so ... [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284573 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:0616 |