Bug 1298936

Summary: redhat-lsb-desktop requires qt3 and LSB 5.0 was released June 3, 2015.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sergio Basto <sergio>
Component: redhat-lsbAssignee: Sergio Basto <sergio>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: an.euroford, johnms, me, ngompa13, ovasik, prd-fedora
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-02-05 19:04:03 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1594543    

Description Sergio Basto 2016-01-15 12:50:25 UTC
Description of problem:
I want remove qt3 [1] , but removes redhat-lsb-desktop which removes google-chrome-beta 
digging 
http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/lsb.shtml

and looks like only qt4 is required 


Additional info:

This is not urgent , but just for the JFTR

dnf repoquery --whatrequires qt3 | grep -v ^qt3-

PyQt-0:3.18.1-31.fc23.x86_64
sim-0:0.9.5-0.42.20091129svn3078rev.fc23.i686
sim-0:0.9.5-0.42.20091129svn3078rev.fc23.x86_64

dnf repoquery --whatrequires PyQt | grep -v ^PyQt-

albumart-0:1.6.6-3.fc23.noarch
kodos-0:2.4.9-17.fc23.noarch
kphotobymail-0:0.4.1-16.fc23.noarch
pipviewer-0:0.3.9-17.fc23.noarch


kodos crash at start-up ... 

[1] 
dnf remove qt3

Comment 1 Ondrej Vasik 2016-01-15 17:56:14 UTC
Thanks for report, you are right, I should find some time and adjust redhat-lsb to 5.0 specifications. You are right qt3 is no longer required by 5.0 specification.

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2016-10-30 10:39:20 UTC
Any update on this? It'd be nice if redhat-lsb was LSB 5.0 compliant.

Comment 3 Igor Gnatenko 2017-11-08 00:17:41 UTC
Alrighty, I"m working on this.

Comment 4 Sergio Basto 2017-11-14 12:31:20 UTC
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
> Alrighty, I"m working on this.

Please can you report what is happening with packages in rawhide  ? 


rpm -q google-chrome-beta --requires  | grep lsb
/usr/bin/lsb_release

Comment 5 Igor Gnatenko 2017-11-14 12:34:36 UTC
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #4)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
> > Alrighty, I"m working on this.
> 
> Please can you report what is happening with packages in rawhide  ? 
Nothing.
> 
> 
> rpm -q google-chrome-beta --requires  | grep lsb
> /usr/bin/lsb_release
So what? If you found some bug, please open new bugreport instead of fiddling some random notes which have nothing to do with "Update of LSB to 5.0".

Comment 6 Sergio Basto 2017-11-14 14:36:33 UTC
> Please can you report what is happening with packages in rawhide  ? 
Nothing.

Sorry I'm just asking if rawhide have any update ? yesterday I got some issues it it in rawhide testing machine .

Comment 7 Sergio Basto 2017-11-14 14:59:39 UTC
https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/redhat-lsb.git

yeah I remember now egrep was not provided 

Thanks , sorry for my bad English

Comment 8 Sergio Basto 2017-11-15 10:07:45 UTC
Igor Gnatenko, what I want mean is: here was a good place to write what change in redhat-lsb package, like I/we do for example in opencv [1] but is not important , sorry . 
And keep you good work , thanks 

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484397

Comment 9 Sergio Basto 2017-11-15 10:34:05 UTC
And keep *your* good work , thanks

Comment 10 Sergio Basto 2018-07-31 21:44:23 UTC
still happens in rawhide !

Comment 11 Maxim Burgerhout 2021-07-06 12:09:03 UTC
So I'm on my Fedora 34 box wondering why there's a reference to /usr/lib64/qt-3.3 in my $PATH, and it turns out it is because of this package :D

It would be really, really nice if redhat-lsb-desktop could stop depending on qt3 in 2021, please, especially since RHEL8 already seems to have dropped it a couple of years ago...

From the looks of it, only a set of immensely old software actually still depends on qt3, and I wonder if anyone still cares about LSB 4? Can't we just drop this dependency already?

Comment 12 Sergio Basto 2023-02-05 19:04:03 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2118596 ***