Bug 1307172

Summary:	Duplicate package
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	William Moreno <williamjmorenor>
Component:	python-livereload	Assignee:	Orphan Owner <extras-orphan>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	24	CC:	mrunge, suanand
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-06-22 10:07:37 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description William Moreno 2016-02-12 22:17:59 UTC

How can say it.... well I have livereload packaged since 2015 as:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/livereload/

Both have the same source.

Comment 1 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-15 05:55:59 UTC

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 2 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-15 06:03:09 UTC

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 3 Parag Nemade 2016-02-15 06:11:09 UTC

Well, its our packaging guidelines which do not states pypi sources should be packaged with prefix "python-". So one can package it with or without "python-" prefix. 

But there is following written in naming guidelines of python 
"Packages of python modules (thus they rely on python as a parent) use a slightly different naming scheme. They should take into account the upstream name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME."

Sundeep,
   Please retire your package as "livereload" already in Fedora. Wish fedora-review could have catch this in its evaluation. While I reviewed this package I could not find any way to find "livereload" package.
Follow, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-15 06:18:32 UTC

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Sundeep Anand 2016-02-15 06:38:12 UTC

Sorry, I was following https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755 and hence the mistake. Retiring https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-livereload/

Comment 6 William Moreno 2016-02-15 14:45:49 UTC

In my first try to package this lib I was going for python-livereload with python2 and python3 support, but reviewer request to remane to livereload and only support python3, do you need python2 support? livereload provides python3-livereload and I can provide python2-livereload, this is not a big issue, do you want to comanintaing the package?

Comment 7 William Moreno 2016-02-15 14:47:22 UTC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230968#c6

Comment 8 Matthias Runge 2016-02-15 17:50:31 UTC

Shouldn't the other livereload package being renamed properly? My reasoning would be, it's primarily a library, where the package also provides an executable script.

Comment 9 Matthias Runge 2016-02-15 17:50:45 UTC

Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308681

Comment 10 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 14:31:00 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase